Surface tension object targeted

AI Thread Summary
Surface tension is a force that occurs at the interface between two bulk phases, acting parallel to that interface. In a fluid at rest, sub-parts of the fluid attract each other due to surface tension. However, in gases like air, the distance between molecules is too great for significant attractive forces to occur, resulting in negligible surface tension. If a fluid is placed inside another fluid, the interactions depend on the properties of both fluids, including their densities and viscosities. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for applications involving multiple fluid phases.
quangtu123
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
To what I know, surface tension is a force that appear at the interface between 2 bulk phases, and is parallel to that interface.

Let consider a bulk of a fluid in the air. In the bulk of a fluid at rest, two sub-parts of a fluid exert a attractive force on one another due to surface tension.

What I'm asking is that: Do two sub-parts of the air around exert a force on one another? (surface tension of the air) If they do, is the force equal the force in the fluid? If they don't, why? What if I replace the air by another suitable fluid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general the molecules in a gas are too far from each other in order to produce non-negligible forces on each other except during very brief collisions. That's the main difference between a liquid and a gas.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok so what would happen if I put a fluid inside some other fluid?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top