Surface Tension vs. Capillary Force

AI Thread Summary
Surface tension and capillary force are related but distinct concepts in fluid dynamics. Surface tension refers to the force per unit length acting at the surface of a liquid, while capillary force arises from the interaction of adhesive forces to the walls and cohesive forces within the fluid. Capillary action is a phenomenon that occurs due to surface tension, enabling liquids to rise in narrow spaces. Understanding the differences between these forces is crucial for applications in various scientific fields. Both concepts illustrate the complex interactions between liquids and their environments.
hasibme2k
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What's the difference between surface tension and capillary force?
Surface tension, a tensor, is the force per unit length. Again surface energy is the energy required to increase the surface area by one unit. Is the surface tension a capillary force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you not tell one from the other?

Capillary action and surface tension are names for related but not identical phenomena.
 
Capillary force is one of the phenomenon due to surface tension.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Capillary force is one of the phenomenon due to surface tension.
Capilary effects are due to both: adhesive forces to the walls, and cohesive forces within the fluid. Surface tension is just cohesion.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top