Susy introduction paper superspace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the anticommutation relation {Q_a, Q_b} = 2 sigma_ab P, where Q represents the charge linking fermions and bosons, and P denotes 4-momentum. This relation is primarily derived from the Coleman-Mandula theorem, which asserts that no nontrivial symmetry can be associated with the Poincaré group. The Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem further supports this by indicating that the anticommutator must be proportional to P due to the absence of other operators that can transform in the required manner. For a comprehensive understanding, Weinberg's Volume 3 is recommended for proof of the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supersymmetry concepts
  • Familiarity with the Coleman-Mandula theorem
  • Knowledge of the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem
  • Basic grasp of quantum field theory and 4-momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Coleman-Mandula theorem in detail
  • Explore the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem and its implications
  • Read Weinberg's Volume 3 for a thorough proof of relevant theorems
  • Investigate the construction and properties of superspace in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in supersymmetry and quantum field theory, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of the foundational theorems in particle physics.

Barmecides
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have read in a susy introduction paper that if we call Q the charge which links fermions and bosons, then we have the following anticommutation relation :
{Q_a, Q_b} = 2 sigma_ab P
where P is 4-momentum.
So, is this relation only due to Coleman-Mandula theorem which force the result of the anticommutation relation to be P ? Or is there any other deeper reason ?
Because it seems this is this relation which explains the building of a superspace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings,

Actually Coleman-Mandula says that there can't be any symmetry linked in a nontrivial way with the Poincare-group. The way around is the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius-Theorem (the second name may be misspelled). If you want a proof for this theorem, try Weinberg Vol 3.
The basic idea is that there are no other operators transforming the way Q_a Q_b has to, so the anticommutator can only be proportional to P.

Eisenhorn.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K