Swimmer off tower: Velocity and Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a swimmer who jumps off a tower and experiences forces while decelerating in water. The subject area includes kinematics and dynamics, focusing on velocity, acceleration, and net forces acting on the swimmer.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the swimmer's velocity upon hitting the water and the net force exerted by the water during deceleration. There are attempts to clarify the acceleration experienced by the swimmer after entering the water and how to account for forces acting on the swimmer, including gravity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning assumptions about acceleration and the forces involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider both the force of gravity and the force exerted by the water, as well as the direction of these forces. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply these concepts to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of force calculations and the implications of directionality in their equations. There is a recognition that the problem may require assumptions about constant forces, and some participants express uncertainty about how to integrate these concepts into their calculations.

Wanting to Learn
Problem:
A 65kg swimmer jumps off a 10.0m tower.
a. Find the swimmer's velocity on hitting the water.
b. The swimmer comes to a stop 2.0m below the surface. Find the net force exerted by the water.
Given & Equations:
v0 = 0m/s
a = 9.8m/s2
d = 10m
vf = __m/s

F = __N

vf2 = v02 + 2ad
F = ma

Work:
vf2 = v02 + 2ad
v2 = 0 + 2•9.8•10
v2 = 196
v = 14

F = m•a
F = 65•9.8
F = 137.2

Conclusion:
So I got
a. = 14m/s
b. = 137.2N

Is this correct? I just started learning force so have no idea whether that seems to be a reasonable amount of force.
Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part b is not correct. The swimmer is no longer in free fall therefore his/her acceleration is not 9.8 m/s2. You need to find what acceleration is needed to change the velocity from 14 m/s to zero over 2 meters.
 
So would acceleration be -7m/s ?
In that case I would get F = 7*14 = 98, but what would I do with the negative, or is it irrelevant?
 
Wanting to Learn said:
So would acceleration be -7m/s ?
How did you get this number? BTW, acceleration has units m/s2.
Also, assuming that a = 7 m/s2, why is F = 7*14? What equation are you thinking of?
The negative is not irrelevant; it denotes a direction opposite to the one you assumed is positive.

On edit: As far as having an intuitive feeling for force is concerned, 1 Newton is approximately the weight of a 1/4 lb. stick of butter.
 
Last edited:
Wanting to Learn said:
Find the net force exerted by the water.
The question ought to tell you to pretend that the force is constant during the deceleration, otherwise there is no way to solve it with the information provided.
 
Wanting to Learn said:
So would acceleration be -7m/s ?
That is the acceleration required to go from 14 m/s to 0m/s in two seconds. The question at hand is how much acceleration to go from 14 m/s to 0 m/s in two meters.
 
I looked in the textbook, found a similar problem, and followed its format (yes I know I should have done that before but because we do not normally use the textbook I hadn't thought to), so I got the following (continued from my earlier work):
vf2 = v02 + 2a(x-x0)
0 = 142 + 2a(2-0)
-196 = 4a
a = -49m/s2

F = m•a
F = 65•-49
F = -3185N

Is this correct?
 
kuruman said:
As far as having an intuitive feeling for force is concerned, 1 Newton is approximately the weight of a 1/4 lb. stick of butter.
Thank you for this.
 
Wanting to Learn said:
I looked in the textbook, found a similar problem, and followed its format (yes I know I should have done that before but because we do not normally use the textbook I hadn't thought to), so I got the following (continued from my earlier work):
vf2 = v02 + 2a(x-x0)
0 = 142 + 2a(2-0)
-196 = 4a
a = -49m/s2

F = m•a
F = 65•-49
F = -3185N

Is this correct?
Almost. The acceleration is correct. The force is correct. But there is a gotcha. Go back and re-read the question.

In F=ma, the F is the total force on the object from all sources. The question asks for the net force by the water on the swimmer. Can you think of something that you've missed?
 
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
Almost. The acceleration is correct. The force is correct. But there is a gotcha. Go back and re-read the question.
In F=ma, the F is the total force on the object from all sources. The question asks for the net force by the water on the swimmer. Can you think of something that you've missed?
Thanks.

I'm not sure, is there force being exerted on the swimmer by something other than the water? Or does that calculation include force other than just what is on the swimmer? Or does it have something to do with how there is both the force the water exerts on the swimmer and that the swimmer exerts on the water?
(This is a new concept and the first homework set we have had on it so I'm not entirely certain about the concepts.)

Edit: Does this have to do with gravity? How would I take that into account?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Wanting to Learn said:
Does this have to do with gravity? How would I take that into account?
Yes, it has to do with gravity.
1. The net force is the sum of all the forces.
2. The net force is mass times acceleration.
3. There are two forces acting on the swimmer, gravity and water friction.
4. Put it together.
 
  • #12
So -49 is total acceleration and -9.8 is the acceleration due to gravity, so does that mean that -39.2 is the acceleration due to the water?
This would make Fwater = 65•-39.2 = -2,548N
 
  • #13
Wanting to Learn said:
So -49 is total acceleration and -9.8 is the acceleration due to gravity, so does that mean that -39.2 is the acceleration due to the water?
F=ma.
You know the acceleration -- 49 m/s^2 downward.
You know the mass -- 65 kg.
You already calculated the total force -- 3185N.

What you have not calculated is the force due to the water alone.
 
  • #14
Wanting to Learn said:
So -49 is total acceleration and -9.8 is the acceleration due to gravity, so does that mean that -39.2 is the acceleration due to the water?
This would make Fwater = 65•-39.2 = -2,548N
Say positive is "up" and negative is "down".
In what direction is the net force, up or down?
In what direction is the force of gravity, up or down?
In what direction is the force of the water, up or down?
 
  • #15
Thanks jbriggs444 for the idea to just say downward instead of trying to use negatives since all the forces I'm dealing with in this are downwards, I find that easier to think about than negatives.
 
  • #16
jbriggs444 said:
What you have not calculated is the force due to the water alone.
So would this be the way to calculate only the force from the water, without including gravity?

Ftotal = 3185N downward
Fgravity = 65•9.8 = 637N downward

Ftotal- Fgravity = Fwater
3185 - 637 = 2,548

Answer:
Fwater = 2,548N downward
 
  • #17
If all the forces are downward and the swimmer is already moving in a downward direction, the speed will increase will it not? To stop something from moving in a given direction, you need to apply a force in the opposite direction. Please reconsider my post #14.

On edit: Perhaps you are confusing velocity and acceleration.
When the acceleration and the velocity point in the same direction, the speed is increasing regardless of whether that direction is positive or negative.
When the acceleration and the velocity point in opposite directions, the speed is decreasing regardless of which is positive and which is negative.
The converse is also true.
 
  • #18
kuruman said:
If all the forces are downward and the swimmer is already moving in a downward direction, the speed will increase will it not? To stop something from moving in a given direction, you need to apply a force in the opposite direction. Please reconsider my post #14.
So is the force of the water upward?
kuruman said:
Say positive is "up" and negative is "down".
In what direction is the net force, up or down?
Is net force up? I'm confused trying to think about this because the swimmer is going down, but I think the force is pushing up because if it was pushing down then the swimmer would just keep going more down.
kuruman said:
In what direction is the force of gravity, up or down?
Gravity would be down.
kuruman said:
In what direction is the force of the water, up or down?
Reference my first replies, is the water force pushing up?

I'm not sure how to apply all this into the calculations if some things should be positive and some negative.
 
  • #19
Wanting to Learn said:
Is net force up?
Facts
1. The net force is always in the direction of the acceleration.
2. The velocity is down in this case.
3. The speed is decreasing because the swimmer eventually comes to a stop.
4. When the speed is decreasing, the acceleration is opposite to the velocity.
So ... in what direction is the net force?
Wanting to Learn said:
'm not sure how to apply all this into the calculations if some things should be positive and some negative.
The net force is the sum of all the forces. What's up is positive and what's down is negative. As you said earlier
Ftotal = Fwater + Fgravity
Just put the numbers in with the appropriate sign in front of each force and solve.
 
  • #20
kuruman said:
in what direction is the net force?
Therefore the net force is upward.
kuruman said:
What's up is positive what's down is negative.
Ftotal = + 3185
Fgravity = - 637
Fwater = + ____
Wanting to Learn said:
Ftotal- Fgravity = Fwater
Should be the same thing as
kuruman said:
Ftotal = Fwater + Fgravity
I just need to be really careful about the signs, so:
Ftotal = Fwater + Fgravity
+3185 = +Fwater + -637
+3185 +637 = +Fwater + -637 +637
+3,822 = +Fwater
So that makes final answer:
Fwater = +3,822
(upward)​
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #21
Yey! It's all very logical. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wanting to Learn
  • #22
kuruman said:
Yey! It's all very logical. :smile:
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K