Swing mass overhead - forces involved

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a mass attached to a string being spun by a scientist. The key issue is understanding how the mass can remain elevated despite the gravitational force acting on it. While the tension in the string initially provides an upward force, concerns arise when the string rotates parallel to the ground, as this would eliminate any vertical component of tension. However, it is clarified that the string will not become parallel to the ground; instead, the mass will follow a conical path, maintaining a vertical component of tension that counteracts gravity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in describing the motion and forces involved in the system.
Mancer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was considering the simple scenario: A mass is attached to a string, which is then twirled around by a scientist overhead. Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.

I'm having some trouble working out the dynamics of this system. Obviously the mass is acted on by gravity, and in order to 'rise' from it's initial position will need a force opposing gravity.

I've reasoned that the tension on the string, while the system is gaining angular momentum from the scientist, will have a component upwards and, provided an appropriate tension, should be enough to get the mass up.

My problem comes when the string eventually is rotating in the plane parallel to the ground; obviously, there is no component of the string tension to oppose gravity. What keeps the mass from falling in this situation?

Best guess is that the mass does indeed fall downward, giving rise to an upward component of the force from the tension in the string, which then returns the mass back to the parallel plane, and oscillates like this while there is still tension in the string.

I considered conservation of angular momentum (neglecting the scientist and frictional forces) but I can't figure how this would stop the mass from falling due to gravity; only that it would have the rotational speed increase as the mass is pulled downward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mancer said:
Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.

No, it will be not plane, but surface of the cone. Plane is a limiting case for infinite rotation speed.
 
Mancer said:
Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.
The mass will rotate in a plane, but that plane will always be below the support point. As you yourself have pointed out, you need a component of string tension acting vertically to counteract the force of gravity.

My problem comes when the string eventually is rotating in the plane parallel to the ground; obviously, there is no component of the string tension to oppose gravity. What keeps the mass from falling in this situation?
As Borek points out, the string will never become parallel to the ground.
 
Oops, mass is in a plane, string is on the cone surface, lack of precision on my side.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top