Symbolizing Quantified Statements in Logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicnicman
  • Start date Start date
nicnicman
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
For a homework assignment I got the following as a question:

Symbolize the following using quantifiers, predicates and logical connectives.

For all integers n, 2n+1 is an odd integer.

Here is what I came up with:

O(x): x is odd
∀x((2x + 1) → O(x))

Would this be the correct form?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I posted doesn't seem right. Maybe it should be something like this:

O(x): x is odd
∀xO(2x + 1)

Would this be correct?
 
Also, the domain of x would be all integers.
 
nicnicman said:
For a homework assignment I got the following as a question:

Symbolize the following using quantifiers, predicates and logical connectives.

For all integers n, 2n+1 is an odd integer.

Here is what I came up with:

O(x): x is odd
∀x((2x + 1) → O(x))

Would this be the correct form?

Thanks

Your transcription says that for all x, if 2x+1, then x is odd. I would use:

Domain is integers, as you said.
O(x): x is odd
∀x∀y((y=2x + 1) → O(y))
 
Yeah, that makes more sense. Now it's saying for every integer x, if y = 2x + 1, then y is always odd.

Thanks a lot!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top