Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Synapse: chemical vs electrical

  1. Jan 24, 2015 #1

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    electric transmission between 2 neurons is way faster than by chemical neurotransmitters....
    then why are there so few electric transmission based synapses in our body??
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 27, 2015 #2
    Maybe neurotransmitters are like endocrinic hormones, or is there no ink at all?
     
  4. Jan 27, 2015 #3

    Ygggdrasil

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    An important part of neurotransmission is the capability of neurons to modulate the strength of transmission between neurons. It may be the case that it is easier to modulate the strength of transmission for chemical synapses than direct electrical connection through gap junctions.
     
  5. Jan 27, 2015 #4

    Pythagorean

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Electrical synapse strength itself is tightly regulated by connectivity (density of electrical synapses) between cells. I assume one of the primary problems with electrical synapses is that they're passive and nonselective to any particular ion. They don't always excite or always inhibit; instead, they seek charge equilibrium between the two cells they connect. Further, they allow passage beyond ions, letting signaling molecules pass between cells. So all these together likely make it difficult to regulate whole brain coordination between cells compared to chemical synapses.

    During early developmental, animals have a lot of gap junctions and as the brain becomes more stable, chemical synapses take over. This suggests to me that a brain with a lot of gap junctions is more susceptible to environment (with respect to how it develops and wires itself) and once the organism is developed, much of the processing has been internalized and automated and the more functionally idiosyncratic chemical synapses take over brain function.

    Gap Junctions in Developing Thalamic and Neocortical Neuronal Networks
    http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/07/10/cercor.bht175.full
     
  6. Jan 27, 2015 #5

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    You mean like a spark gap? That would be so bad for so many reasons....
     
  7. Jan 28, 2015 #6

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    considering the gap is 20nm wide.
     
  8. Jan 28, 2015 #7

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    okay thank you guys, for these replies.
    A related question. My prof. was telling us that the slow speed of chemical transmission played an important role in the extinction of dinosaurs.
    He also added that it took hours for a particular signal to be relayed from their tail to their tiny little brain. Is this true?
     
  9. Jan 28, 2015 #8

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Endocrine hormones would imply the involvement of blood.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Synapse: chemical vs electrical
  1. Chemical elements (Replies: 2)

Loading...