MHB System of congruences with no solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter vincentvance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
vincentvance
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to prove that the system

x ≡ 5 (mod 6)
x ≡ 7 (mod 15)

has no solution. This example is done in my textbook and they say one should first assume that there is a solution x, and that when taking classes mod 6 the second equation implies that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6). After this the example continues and I can follow the remaining steps, but this particular part I don't understand. What does it mean to "take classes mod 6" and why does the second equation imply that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6)?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vincentvance said:
Hello,

I am trying to prove that the system

x ≡ 5 (mod 6)
x ≡ 7 (mod 15)

has no solution. This example is done in my textbook and they say one should first assume that there is a solution x, and that when taking classes mod 6 the second equation implies that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6). After this the example continues and I can follow the remaining steps, but this particular part I don't understand. What does it mean to "take classes mod 6" and why does the second equation imply that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6)?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
You might find it easiest to understand this by working mod 3, using the fact that 6 and 15 are both multiples of 3. In fact, if $x \equiv 5\pmod6$ then $x\equiv2\pmod3$. But if $x\equiv7\pmod{15}$ then $x\equiv1\pmod3.$
 
Opalg said:
You might find it easiest to understand this by working mod 3, using the fact that 6 and 15 are both multiples of 3. In fact, if $x \equiv 5\pmod6$ then $x\equiv2\pmod3$. But if $x\equiv7\pmod{15}$ then $x\equiv1\pmod3.$

I feel like such an idiot, but I don't understand why for example if x ≡ 5 (mod 6) then x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
 
vincentvance said:
I don't understand why for example if x ≡ 5 (mod 6) then x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
Think of it from the basic definition. If x ≡ 5 (mod 6), it means that $x$ is a multiple of 6, plus 5. Say $x = 6k+5$, for some integer $k$. You can write that as $x = 3(2k+1) + 2$. In other words, $x$ is a multiple of 3, plus 2. That is the same as saying x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
 
Opalg said:
Think of it from the basic definition. If x ≡ 5 (mod 6), it means that $x$ is a multiple of 6, plus 5. Say $x = 6k+5$, for some integer $k$. You can write that as $x = 3(2k+1) + 2$. In other words, $x$ is a multiple of 3, plus 2. That is the same as saying x ≡ 2 (mod 3).

Ah. Of course, now it makes sense. Thank you so much!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top