System of Equations Mechanics problem

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of x_2 when two objects are nearest to each other, the equations x_1 = 23.0t and x_2 = -28.0 + 43.0t - 8.0t^2 are used. The approach involves substituting t from the first equation into the second. The goal is to minimize the distance between x_1 and x_2 by setting the derivative of their difference to zero. The discussion emphasizes that minimizing the distance requires focusing on the absolute difference |x_1 - x_2|. The problem-solving strategy was clarified, leading to a better understanding of the relationship between the two equations.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
The x-coordinates of two objects moving along the x-axis are given below as a function of time t. x_1 and x_2 never have the same value. Calculate the value of x_2 when the objects are nearest to each other.
x_1= 23.0t
x_2= -28.0 +43.0t-8.0t^2

I solved the first equation for t, and then plugged it into the second one to get x_2= -28.0 + 43.0( \frac {x_1}{23}) -8.0(\frac {x_1}{23})^2

I tried to use the quadratic formula but got a negative number... can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what value did you use for x_2 in your quadratic formula?
it's easier algebra to replace those "x1/23" terms with "t".

This is a relative location question ... what is x2 rel. to x1?
now there's only one equation, one unknown (t).
minimize x2-x1 , by setting t-derivitive =0.
 
If you mean you completed the square to find the minimum value of the quadratic then, since that quadratic is equal to x2, you are just finding the minimum value of x2 itself, not where the distance between x1 and x2 is a minimum.

The distance between x1 and x2 is |x1- x2|- that's what you want to minimize.

It's probably simplest to look at x1- x2 and x2- x1 separately.
 
Ok I got it... thanks for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top