T: What Stars Are We Seeing Between Galaxies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The majority of stars are located within galaxies, with only a small percentage existing in intergalactic space. Observing solitary stars outside our galaxy is extremely challenging, requiring powerful telescopes due to their faintness. Most stars found outside galaxies are likely ejected from their original galaxies, often due to interactions with massive bodies like black holes. Recent research suggests that stars between galaxies may be more common than previously believed, though this remains speculative. Overall, when observing stars not in our galaxy, it is often the case that they belong to distant galaxies.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Are there very many stars (percentage wise) between galaxies?

Or are most of the stars within galaxies?

I guess my main question is when we see stars that are not in our galaxy are we probably looking at a distant galaxy?Tex
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The majority of stars are inside of galaxies, though there are some that get ejected and drift through intergalactic space.

thetexan said:
I guess my main question is when we see stars that are not in our galaxy are we probably looking at a distant galaxy?

Most likely, yes. Though keep in mind that it is very, very difficult to observe solitary stars outside of our own galaxy. Only the largest telescopes have the resolution and light gathering power to see them.
 
Last edited:
The only stars likely to exist outside of galaxies are those that have been ejected from their host galaxy via an encounter with a very massive body, like a black hole. As Drakkith noted, it is not easy to count extragalactic stragglers because individual stars are incredibly faint at intergalactic distances.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top