Taking a number to a complex number power

ucbugrad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How do you compute the following?

2it where t is a real number

while I am at it, how do you compute powers that are not integers

ie: 23.14
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2^(it) = exp(it(log2)) = exp(i(tlog2)) = cos(tlog2) + isin(tlog2)

I guess we would define

2^(3.14) = exp(3.14(log2))

I'm not sure if i could write it in any other way, and i doubt i could compute that in my head but they are equivalent.

Sorry for the bad formatting if it isn't clear.

Edit: These logs are base e.
 
Last edited:
"3.14", as opposed to \pi, is a rational number. It is, in fact, 314/100= 157/50 so 2^{3.14}= 2^{157/50}= \sqrt[50]{2^{157}}.

\pi is not rational but there exist a sequence of rational numbers that converge to it (the sequence 3, 3.1, 3.14, ..., for example). 2^\pi is equal to the limit of the sequence 2^3, 2^{3.1}= 2^{31/10}= \sqrt[10]{2^{31}}=, 2^{3.14}= 2^{314/100}= \sqrt[50]{2^{157}},...

Of course, to actually calculate those things you would use 2^a= e^{a ln(2)} as The1337gamer said.
 
Thank you all, both addressed all of my issues. Halls of Ivy: where can I find more about this sequence that converges to Pi? What is the formula for each term?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
746
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top