Taking a number to a complex number power

ucbugrad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How do you compute the following?

2it where t is a real number

while I am at it, how do you compute powers that are not integers

ie: 23.14
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2^(it) = exp(it(log2)) = exp(i(tlog2)) = cos(tlog2) + isin(tlog2)

I guess we would define

2^(3.14) = exp(3.14(log2))

I'm not sure if i could write it in any other way, and i doubt i could compute that in my head but they are equivalent.

Sorry for the bad formatting if it isn't clear.

Edit: These logs are base e.
 
Last edited:
"3.14", as opposed to \pi, is a rational number. It is, in fact, 314/100= 157/50 so 2^{3.14}= 2^{157/50}= \sqrt[50]{2^{157}}.

\pi is not rational but there exist a sequence of rational numbers that converge to it (the sequence 3, 3.1, 3.14, ..., for example). 2^\pi is equal to the limit of the sequence 2^3, 2^{3.1}= 2^{31/10}= \sqrt[10]{2^{31}}=, 2^{3.14}= 2^{314/100}= \sqrt[50]{2^{157}},...

Of course, to actually calculate those things you would use 2^a= e^{a ln(2)} as The1337gamer said.
 
Thank you all, both addressed all of my issues. Halls of Ivy: where can I find more about this sequence that converges to Pi? What is the formula for each term?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
749
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top