A Taking all the electrons away from a real conductor

FortranMan
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How many electrons can you remove from a solid substance before it breaks down at a chemical level?
How many electrons can you remove from a solid substance before it breaks down at a chemical level?

Thinking this through myself, you can create positively or negatively charged objects to a degree, especially with a metallic conductor that can tolerate a loss of charge at the cost of the entire conductor becoming slightly charged at its surface. However how long can we keep emptying a conductor of electrons? Will electrons in their valence band become excited and jump into the conductor band, allowing us to strip more electrons from the conductor? But as valence electrons are critical for determining the chemical behavior of elements, would this adversely affect the chemical bonds holding the conductor together? As a side question, how many electrons can you strip from a molecule like water before it chemically breaks down as there are no electrons available to form covalent bonds? Is this a complex question, too abstract, or is it easily studied experimentally by observing the dielectric breakdown strengths of different materials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Long before you get chemical effects the charge will be so large that the material emits atoms from the surface, or the whole material explodes: A Coulomb explosion. This is routinely done with lasers.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman, DrClaude and OmCheeto
FortranMan said:
As a side question, how many electrons can you strip from a molecule like water before it chemically breaks down as there are no electrons available to form covalent bonds?
That depends on various factors like how you strip those electrons and the chemical surroundings.

An interesting curiosity: if you heavily ionize an atom you can actually influence some nuclear properties like the decay constant. For example, a stable isotope of K (potassium) was successfully forced to ##\beta^{-}##-decay after full ionization in order to fill the first orbital.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top