Tangential and centripetal acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating tangential and centripetal acceleration for a particle given its position, velocity magnitude, and acceleration vector. The participant has the position coordinates, velocity magnitude of 4.78 m/s, and an acceleration of 6.01 m/s². To find the tangential acceleration, the acceleration magnitude is multiplied by the tangent unit vector, while centripetal acceleration can be derived from the velocity and radius of curvature. The participant seeks numerical values and clarification on the tangent unit vector, which is expressed in terms of its components. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical approach needed to solve the problem effectively.
RaamGeneral
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello.

Sorry for this very silly question, but I struggled myself too long on this (it was on the test and fortunataly I could answer correctly, but have not understood how to solve that).

I know a particle, in a certain instant, has position ##(x_0,y_0,z_0)##
I know the velocity magnitude ##\vec{v} = v_p \hat{\tau}##

where tau is the tangent unit vector.
And I know also the acceleration vector:
##\vec{a}=a_0\hat{x}+a_0\hat{y}##I have to find the tangential and centripetal acceleration of the particle at that instant.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tangential acc is a times tau.
you can then figure out centripetal acceleration.
 
Ok, I think I should insert the numbers here, because I have to figure out the numerical value and I do know nothing about tau.
position ##(x_0 = \sqrt 3 m , y_0=1 m , z_0 =2.12 m)##
##v_p = 4.78 m/s##
##a_0 = 6.01 m/s^2##

I have only this, nothing less, nothing more.
 
Please, it's my last unfinished business.
This is the original text. It's in italian, but mathematics is a universal language.
Capture.PNG
 
ep = cos30 ex + sin30 ey
then take the dot product of ep and a
i.e.
(cos30 ex + sin30 ey)⋅(6.01 ex + 6.01 ey)
 
  • Like
Likes RaamGeneral
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top