Tangential Velocity (maybe)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of tangential velocity in the context of circular motion, specifically focusing on the relationship between two points, A and B, rotating around a common center. Participants explore the necessary conditions and information required to calculate the tangential velocity of point B, including angular velocities and initial positions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the tangential velocity of point B can be derived from the angular velocities and positions of points A and B.
  • Others argue that additional information, such as the initial positions of A and B, is necessary to calculate the tangential velocity accurately.
  • A participant suggests using "o'clock" positions to describe the locations of points A and B on their respective circles.
  • There is a discussion about whether the linear velocities of A and B can simply be added together, with some participants expressing uncertainty about this approach.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of using symbols and algebraic expressions rather than numerical values for clarity in calculations.
  • One participant mentions that the problem can be solved using vectors and their derivatives, although they note that the final expression may be complex.
  • Historical context is introduced, referencing Ptolemy's geocentric model and Newton's contributions to calculus in understanding planetary motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of vector analysis and the complexity of the problem. While some agree on the importance of initial conditions, others question the need for vector representation, leading to an unresolved discussion about the best approach to solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the positions and angular velocities of points A and B, as well as the dependency on definitions of tangential velocity and angular velocity. The discussion also reflects varying levels of mathematical background among participants, which affects their ability to engage with the problem.

  • #31
kuruman said:
What additional description do you require?
Actually I want to know why B will start rotating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I assume that vector A rotates about the origin, referenced to the x-axis.
Does vector B rotate relative to vector A, or relative to the x-axis ?

Which tangential velocity is required? Is it the rate of point B about the origin in rad/sec, or distance per second about the origin.
Or is it the instantaneous velocity of point B on the x, y plane ?

titasdasplus said:
Actually I want to know why B will start rotating?
Because it is specified as having an angular frequency.
What alternatives are there?
 
  • #33
haruspex said:
In that thread, I did show that the expression gave the right answer in a couple of special cases. Maybe you would find that more persuasive?
You were right, and my "suspicion" was wrong. I misinterpreted the requirement in the OP (see the "edit" in post #29).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: haruspex
  • #34
kuruman said:
Around 200 CE, Ptolemy came close to describing planetary motion within the geocentric model. He used the idea of epicycles which is essentially what we have here
Well, in this case we're describing the orbit of the Moon...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
490
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
990
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K