Task with spring, energy, velocity and angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a projectile as it exits a spring cannon angled at 38 degrees. Key points include the need to account for gravitational potential energy (PE) and the angle of the cannon when determining the velocity. It was clarified that the energy from the spring does not require vectorization since it aligns with the velocity's angle, while gravitational PE must be adjusted for the angle using trigonometry. The participant initially miscalculated the velocity due to confusion about the contributions of gravitational PE and the spring's energy. After corrections, the calculations were deemed satisfactory, emphasizing the importance of understanding potential energy in this context.
DrOnline
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile is loaded into a spring cannon.

Find its velocity as it leaves the spring.

The cannon is angled at 38 degrees above the horizontal. (θ=38)

m=0.025kg
k=100 N/m
x0=0.13m
x1=0.05m

(We press the spring down 13 cm when we load it. When it stops expanding, it still has 5 cm of winding left. Bit ambiguous in the text, but I interpret this to mean there is some mechanism that stops it from expanding the full 13 cm)

Homework Equations



0.5*k*x^2
0.5*m*v^2
mgh

E(initial) = E(final)

The Attempt at a Solution



Do I have to account for the angle to find the velocity as it leaves the spring?

Please correct me on this:

1) The energy contribution from the spring does not need to be vectorized, because it is angled in parallell with the angle of the velocity we're measuring.

2) The contribution from gravity also does not need to be vectorized, because when there is no friction, all the gravity will push against the spring direction regardless of angle. This one I am really unsure of..

If I pretend the cannon points completely vertically:

Njuw3yV.jpg


0cgyBEH.jpg


3) If statement 3 is correct: all angles for the cannon between 90 and 0 will give the same velocity.
If statement 3 is incorrect, and the retarding contribution from gravity changes with angle, surely 90 degrees (completely vertical) will give the lowest velocity, and 0 degrees with give the highest.

This conflicts with my calculations of 7.69 m/s for vertical, because the answer given is only 7.53 m/s

What am I doing wrong? Any help whatsoever would be appreciated, spent.. 4 hours on this simply task now hah!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gain in gravitational PE is only related to the change in height, so, yes, you do need to multiply by the sine of the angle. Your mistake is that you are adding the gain in gravitational PE instead of subtracting it. (.05-.13 will be negative.)
 
Thanks.

I am learning physics in a language other than English.

What is PE an acronym for?

Are you using the term "gain" in the same sense I am using the word "contribution"?

Actually, I see that if g= -9.81 that takes care of itself... Which makes sense.

And then I need to do some trigonometry work to modify the impact of gravity taking into account the angle.

Gonna give that a go tomorrow, way past midnight here heh.
 
DrOnline said:
What is PE an acronym for?
Potential Energy. In the present problem there is PE in the spring and gravitational PE.
Are you using the term "gain" in the same sense I am using the word "contribution"?
As the spring expands, there is a loss of PE in the spring, a gain (increase) of gravitational PE, and a gain of KE (kinetic energy).
 
Thanks again. I should have understood PE stands for potential energy. I know how that works.

I have made the changes to the calculations now and it looks good to me, uploading it in case somebody else wonders about this problem in the future:

VzRGLpP.jpg
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top