News Taxes: How Much Should Individuals Contribute to Government Spending?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edpell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Taxes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate percentage of Gross National Product (GNP) that government should consume, with suggestions ranging from 30% total (10% for federal, state, and local levels) to concerns that current government spending is around 45% of GNP, factoring in deficit spending. References to Hauser's Law and the Laffer Curve highlight the relationship between tax rates and revenue, suggesting that excessive taxation could lead to individuals leaving the country. Some participants argue that government spending should be sufficient to provide essential services, including a social safety net, infrastructure maintenance, universal education, and healthcare. There is a belief that reducing military expenditures could enable the U.S. to enhance its social services without increasing overall spending. The conversation emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to taxation and government spending to ensure quality of life while avoiding excessive taxation that drives people away.
edpell
Messages
282
Reaction score
4
What percentage of gross national product do we feel government should consume? And conversely what percentage should be left in the control of individuals?

I would say that 10% for the federal level and 10% for the state level and 10% for all other levels would be reasonable. That is 30% total. I think we are now well about 50% total tax.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Reminds me of the Laffer Curve. Both make sense. You squeeze hard enough and people vote with their feet (they leave).
 
Total US government (fed and local) spending is currently about about 45% of GDP. As we know some of that is deficit spending, so the revenues are necessarily lower than 45%.

4.79_33.88_33.68_32.65_33.24_34.14_34.75_35.28_35.56_34.83_35.93_35.90_37.09_42.86_44.67&legend=.png
Looking at the federal spending alone, it apprears Hauser's revenue law may not be far off, at least since he coined it. Here's federal spending alone. Again I don't have revenue alone but if we subtract off the deficits now, add in the surpluses around 99, then it does indeed seem to be approximately true the revenues are around 20% no matter what.

9.91_19.22_19.04_18.50_18.35_18.11_19.34_19.39_19.32_19.56_19.82_19.38_20.65_24.71_25.44&legend=.png
 
Last edited:
What percentage of gross national product do we feel government should consume?

As much as needed to provide the social safety net to all citizens, to maintain and improve infrastructure, to provide free universal education up to and including college, and to provide free healthcare to everyone.

Evident gaping holes in the U.S. coverage seem to indicate that the government does not spend enough. However, it's possible that we could end two wars and scale down defense spending, and that would be enough to provide European quality of life to all citizens, without additional spending.

edpell said:
Reminds me of the Laffer Curve. Both make sense. You squeeze hard enough and people vote with their feet (they leave).

People tend to underestimate how high taxes have to be before people start voting with their feet.

The U.S. has the second smallest government in the developed world, ahead of Canada. (And Canada does not have to finance two wars, maintain 150 F-22's, 11 aircraft carriers, and a few thousand ICBM silos.)
 
hamster143 said:
... to provide free universal education up to and including college, and to provide free healthcare to everyone.
Nothing is free.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
69
Views
10K
Replies
49
Views
11K
Replies
124
Views
16K
Replies
66
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top