Telescope with a pinhole as the Objective?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Frenemy90210
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    telescope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a pinhole as the objective lens in a telescope, including the implications of replacing both the objective and eyepiece lenses with pinholes. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of this idea, considering its application in astronomy and the limitations it may present.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a telescope can function effectively with a pinhole as the objective lens, suggesting that visibility may be significantly compromised.
  • One participant shares their personal experience of trying a pinhole telescope, noting that they saw nothing, which raises doubts about the effectiveness of such a setup.
  • Another participant mentions that a pinhole is suitable for safely observing sunspots using a projection method, but questions the differences in observing celestial objects like galaxies.
  • A participant highlights that a pinhole does not collect much light, which is critical for observing dim objects, and that diffraction effects would impact resolution.
  • Some propose workarounds, such as using multiple pinholes or long exposure times, but acknowledge that these methods have their own limitations, including background noise and diffraction issues.
  • Concerns are raised about safety when discussing pinhole observations of the sun, with suggestions to reword safety warnings to prevent children from looking directly at the sun.
  • One participant emphasizes that the primary challenge in astronomy is light gathering, arguing that a pinhole setup would not capture enough light to produce useful images.
  • Another participant clarifies that a pinhole does not focus light rays in the same way as a lens, which could lead to misunderstandings about its functionality in imaging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of using pinholes in telescopes, with no consensus reached on whether this approach can yield useful results. There are competing perspectives on the practicality and theoretical implications of such a design.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various limitations, including the dependence on light collection capabilities, the impact of diffraction, and the challenges posed by background noise during long exposures. The discussion also reflects a lack of agreement on the practical applications of pinholes in astronomical observations.

Frenemy90210
Will a telescope work if its front lens (Objective lens) is replaced with a pinhole ? What if both lenses ( Objective and eyepiece) are replaced with pin holes ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Frenemy90210 said:
Will a telescope work if its front lens (Objective lens) is replaced with a pinhole ? What if both lenses ( Objective and eyepiece) are replaced with pin holes ?

since you labelled you thread with an "I" tag, you should be used to doing research as a undergrad student

so what do you think?
how about trying it out and telling us what happens

Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
davenn said:
since you labelled you thread with an "I" tag, you should be used to doing research as a undergrad student

so what do you think?
how about trying it out and telling us what happens

Dave
I had tried it a few years ago without much success. Frankly nothing was visible. May be somebody else knows/experienced otherwise.
 
Frenemy90210 said:
I had tried it a few years ago without much success. Frankly nothing was visible. May be somebody else knows/experienced otherwise.

OK
well I doubt a pinhole at each end will be successful

do you know what a pinhole camera is ?
do a quick google and then have some fun :smile:
 
Ed. note: I changed the label to "B", so more basic posts are possible.
 
A pinhole is good for looking at sun spots safely. (Projection method)
 
sophiecentaur said:
A pinhole is good for looking at sun spots safely. (Projection method)
So, @Frenemy90210, can you tell us what is different between observing the sun and, say, a galaxy, that could make it work for one and not the other...?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
russ_watters said:
So, @Frenemy90210, can you tell us what is different between observing the sun and, say, a galaxy, that could make it work for one and not the other...?
. . . . and why the best and most expensive camera lenses have so much glass on the front?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
sophiecentaur said:
A pinhole is good for looking at sun spots safely. (Projection method)
I only want to mention that the emphasis here lies on projection. Just in case: Do not look directly into the sun, pinhole or not!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frenemy90210 and sophiecentaur
  • #10
The bigger the aperture and the wider the field of view, the more light you will collect. Typically, if you are measuring something dim like a galaxy you will be photon limited. A pinhole doesn't collect much light.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
So, @Frenemy90210, can you tell us what is different between observing the sun and, say, a galaxy, that could make it work for one and not the other...?
I can see what you are getting at. Sun emits lot of light and in the other case its not. The reason I asked the question was to know if there is a workaround to that problem. I guess not.
 
  • #12
Frenemy90210 said:
know if there is a workaround to that problem.
The workaround is to use many many pinholes over a large area and arrange the phase delay through each hole to be the same so that a coherent image is formed from all of the holes . That's what a lens achieves for you. :wink:
 
  • #13
Khashishi said:
The bigger the aperture and the wider the field of view, the more light you will collect. Typically, if you are measuring something dim like a galaxy you will be photon limited. A pinhole doesn't collect much light.
And a pinhole is so small that diffraction will noticeably affect resolution.
 
  • #14
Another workaround is to use a very long exposure time, though you are going to run into issues with background noise and the rotation of the Earth.
 
  • #15
Khashishi said:
Another workaround is to use a very long exposure time, though you are going to run into issues with background noise and the rotation of the Earth.
That still wouldn't take care of diffraction. Also the actual increase would involve extremely long exposure times (days) for any but the very brightest astronomical objects.
This topic is essentially a practical one and 'in principle' ideas don't necessarily have a place, imo.
 
  • #16
sophiecentaur said:
A pinhole is good for looking at sun spots safely. (Projection method)

I think it will be great if this statement is re-written/re worded completely from safety point of view. There might be children who are reading this page. Children might be stare at the sun directly through a pin-hole.
 
  • #17
Frenemy90210 said:
I think it will be great if this statement is re-written/re worded completely from safety point of view. There might be children who are reading this page. Children might be stare at the sun directly through a pin-hole.
I agree:
Never try to observe the Sun by looking at it directly unless you are using properly designed viewing equipment.
It can easily lead to blindness.
Navigators on ships, in the past, all went blind in one eye because their navigation equipment was not designed properly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frenemy90210
  • #18
Light gathering is the entire challenge. You can take terrific celestial pictures using a standard camera and lens system as long as you can get it stare at one point in the sky long enough. People do this all the time with a standard camera piggy-backed to a well-guided telescope tube. The telescope is only there to provide a star drive based on sighting on a guide star.

Therefore, going the other direction with a pinhole, while it does focus light rays, serves little or no purpose in astronomy simply because it can't capture enough light to make a useful image. Furthermore, "all that glass" in a camera lens is there to adjust for the fact that shorter light rays (blue and ultraviolet) refract at different angles than longer wavelengths (red and infrared) so that all the visible wavelengths focus in one plane. The more elements and the better the glass in the lens determines how well it does compensate for the errors that can occur. Each new major telescope has a bigger and bigger main mirror to do one thing, gather more light. Compare James Webb to Hubble and it's quite easy to see what's going on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frenemy90210
  • #19
trainman2001 said:
Therefore, going the other direction with a pinhole, while it does focus light rays, serves little or no purpose in astronomy simply because it can't capture enough light to make a useful image.

A pinhole does NOT focus light rays, as can be seen by moving it relative to the projection screen which only alters the size of the image. The sharpness of the image is better with smaller images, but only because the circle of confusion is smaller as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
30K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K