Temperature difference by Dimensional analysis.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using dimensional analysis to determine the relationship between temperature, volume, heat, radiation, and heat capacity in the context of radioactive decay heating water. The participant proposes dependent variables and derives their dimensions, ultimately leading to an equation that suggests temperature is proportional to the square of heat divided by the product of radiation and heat capacity. However, they express skepticism about the validity of their findings, particularly noting that volume does not appear in the final equation. Suggestions are made to include additional parameters, such as the thermal conductivity of uranium and the temperature of the water, to refine the analysis. The overall sentiment is a recognition of the complexity involved in accurately modeling the thermal effects of radioactive decay.
pogs
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A block of uranium is kept cool in water. How does the difference between the temperature in the centre of the block and the temperature in the water depend on the size of the block?
Relevant Equations
n = n_0*e^(-t/τ) : Radioactive Decay
Attempt at solution:

I wanted to try and solve this with dimensional analysis. I reasoned that I would chose the following dependent variables:
- [V] : Volume ( of the block)
- [Q] : Heat ( the radioactive decay would cause some heating of the water)
- [R]: Radiation
- [Cv]: Heat capacity

I'm thinking the amount of radiation is a factor, it causes the heating and thus the bigger the block the more the radiation, the more heating. Also the heat capacity may play a part.

Taking the dimensions of these I get the following
[V] = L^3
[Q] = M L^2 T ^-2
[R] = L^2 M T^-1
[Cv] = L^2 M K^-1 T

Now we want a temperature so we can set up an equation

Temp(K) = [V]^α * [Q]^β * [R]^γ *[Cv] ^δ = (L^3)^α*(M L^2 T ^-2)^β*(L^2 M T^-1)^γ * (L^2 M K^-1 T)^δ

Taking the dimensions we get

L = 0 = 3α +2β +2γ +2δ
T = 0 = -2β -γ +δ
M = 0 = β +γ +δ
K = 1 = -δ

But when I solve these equations I get
α = 0
β = 2
γ = -1
δ = -1

giving me an equation that says

Q^2/(R*C_v)

Which I'm not to convinced by... Also V disappears as alpha is zero. I guess my dependent variables are wrong somehow. Any ideas/tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pogs said:
I wanted to try and solve this with dimensional analysis
Not convinced that that is possible.

How about an approach along the line
Uranium decays. Heat generated ##\propto## ...​
Heat exchange with surrounding water ##\propto## ...​

?

##\ ##
 
Other parameters you should include are thermal conductivity of the uranium and temperature of the water.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top