Temperature difference by Dimensional analysis.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using dimensional analysis to determine the relationship between temperature and various factors in a system involving radioactive decay and heat transfer. The dependent variables identified include Volume [V], Heat [Q], Radiation [R], and Heat Capacity [Cv]. The derived equation suggests that temperature is proportional to the ratio of heat squared to the product of radiation and heat capacity, specifically Q^2/(R*C_v). The participant expresses uncertainty about the omission of volume and seeks advice on refining their approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of heat transfer and thermal conductivity
  • Knowledge of radioactive decay processes
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics, particularly heat capacity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of dimensional analysis in greater depth
  • Study the relationship between thermal conductivity and heat transfer in fluids
  • Explore the effects of radioactive decay on temperature changes in surrounding materials
  • Investigate the role of heat capacity in thermal systems, particularly in relation to water
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in physics, engineers working with thermal systems, and students studying thermodynamics and heat transfer principles will benefit from this discussion.

pogs
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A block of uranium is kept cool in water. How does the difference between the temperature in the centre of the block and the temperature in the water depend on the size of the block?
Relevant Equations
n = n_0*e^(-t/τ) : Radioactive Decay
Attempt at solution:

I wanted to try and solve this with dimensional analysis. I reasoned that I would chose the following dependent variables:
- [V] : Volume ( of the block)
- [Q] : Heat ( the radioactive decay would cause some heating of the water)
- [R]: Radiation
- [Cv]: Heat capacity

I'm thinking the amount of radiation is a factor, it causes the heating and thus the bigger the block the more the radiation, the more heating. Also the heat capacity may play a part.

Taking the dimensions of these I get the following
[V] = L^3
[Q] = M L^2 T ^-2
[R] = L^2 M T^-1
[Cv] = L^2 M K^-1 T

Now we want a temperature so we can set up an equation

Temp(K) = [V]^α * [Q]^β * [R]^γ *[Cv] ^δ = (L^3)^α*(M L^2 T ^-2)^β*(L^2 M T^-1)^γ * (L^2 M K^-1 T)^δ

Taking the dimensions we get

L = 0 = 3α +2β +2γ +2δ
T = 0 = -2β -γ +δ
M = 0 = β +γ +δ
K = 1 = -δ

But when I solve these equations I get
α = 0
β = 2
γ = -1
δ = -1

giving me an equation that says

Q^2/(R*C_v)

Which I'm not to convinced by... Also V disappears as alpha is zero. I guess my dependent variables are wrong somehow. Any ideas/tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pogs said:
I wanted to try and solve this with dimensional analysis
Not convinced that that is possible.

How about an approach along the line
Uranium decays. Heat generated ##\propto## ...​
Heat exchange with surrounding water ##\propto## ...​

?

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Other parameters you should include are thermal conductivity of the uranium and temperature of the water.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K