Temperature need to melt this ice in 400 years

AI Thread Summary
To melt ice at -30°C covering 34 million km² and 11.4 km high in 400 years, a consistent application of heat is required. The discussion emphasizes that heat, rather than temperature alone, is necessary for melting ice. There are complexities in calculating the required temperature, as sustained temperatures above 0°C would lead to immediate melting and runoff, complicating the process. Additionally, the area of ice may not be a significant factor in determining the required heat. Accurate calculations must consider the heat flow through the ice and the dynamics of melting.
Aleksa S.
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How much temperature is needed to melt ice -30C that covers an area of 34 million km2 and has the height of 11.4 km in 400 years? For example, X number of celsius degrees are applied non-stop for 400 years in order to melt this ice entirely from the surface (turn to water)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aleksa S. said:
How much temperature is needed to melt ice -30C that covers an area of 34 million km2 and has the height of 11.4 km in 400 years? For example, X number of celsius degrees are applied non-stop for 400 years in order to melt this ice entirely from the surface (turn to water)

Heat melts ice, not Temperature.
 
Quantum Defect said:
Heat melts ice, not Temperature.
Alright, heat then.
 
Aleksa S. said:
How much temperature is needed to melt ice -30C that covers an area of 34 million km2 and has the height of 11.4 km in 400 years? For example, X number of celsius degrees are applied non-stop for 400 years in order to melt this ice entirely from the surface (turn to water)
You need to show some work of your own, you can't just come here and ask for an answer. That's not the way the forum works. You should read the rules. If you don't follow them, you run the risk of your post just getting deleted (or closed).
 
Quantum Defect said:
Heat melts ice, not Temperature.
Not so fast. The question specifies a time period and that the heat is applied at the surface. It also explicitly mentions degrees C. So it might really be looking for a surface temperature which, if sustained, would melt all the ice in that time.
On the other hand, there are two snags with that interpretation:
1. The area would not matter
2. If you literally were to sustain a temperature > 0C then the surface layer would melt instantly. If that were to run off instantly, then the next ice would melt instantly, etc. So you'd have to suppose a certain depth of water at any time and consider the heat flow through it.
Aleksa, have you stated the question word for word as presented to you?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top