Temperature of Cosmological Constant

friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
Is there a temperature related to the cosmological constant?

As I understand it, the cosmological constant is produced by dark energy and is a form of zero point energy created by virtual particles and antiparticles being created and annihilated all the time. It seems to me that this process could produce a temperature that might be measureable. With particles pairs being created and annihilated everywhere at all times, it seems likely that a virtual particle created somewhere might collide with another virtual particle created nearby and prevent some virtual particles from annihilating with the partener it was created with. The net result would be creation of real particles creating a background radiation which we might be able to measure. Or do all such virtual pairs travel right through each other like bosons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of using virtual particles to predict the cosmological constant suffers from one fatal flaw - the size predicted is about 120 orders of magnitude too large.
 
mathman said:
The idea of using virtual particles to predict the cosmological constant suffers from one fatal flaw - the size predicted is about 120 orders of magnitude too large.

I guess I'm asking if separate virtual particle pairs can interact with each other and produce real particles.
 
The only theory (I know of - I'm no expert) that seems like your suggestion is black hole evaporation, where one of the pair escapes and the other is absorbed in the black hole.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top