Tension/acceleration between 2 Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter tascja
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two masses connected by a string over a massless pulley, where one mass is on an inclined plane and the other is hanging. The scenario includes a coefficient of kinetic friction and requires determining the acceleration of the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss analyzing the forces acting on each mass separately and applying Newton's second law. There is uncertainty about how to relate the forces and whether to combine equations or isolate variables like tension.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problem, including isolating tension and substituting it into equations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the treatment of forces acting on each mass, and there is a recognition of the need to check calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a coefficient of friction and the need to calculate the frictional force based on the normal force, which is derived from the incline angle. Participants are also reflecting on their calculations and correcting previous errors.

tascja
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


two masses are connected by a thing string running over a massless pulley. m1 slides on a 35deg ramp with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.40, while m2 hans from the string. what is the acceleration of the masses?
m1 = 1.5 kg
m2 = 3 kg

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


im not quite sure how to relate the object that is on an incline to the object that is hanging and has its forces going up and down?

would the net force equation just be:
Fnet = (m1+m2)a
m2g - Ff - T = (m1 +m2)a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rather than attempt to treat both masses together in one equation from the outset, analyze the forces acting on each mass separately. Apply Newton's 2nd law to each, then combine the two equations to solve for the acceleration.
 
m2g - Ff - T = (m1 +m2)a
You wouldn't put in the Tension when including all the forces like this. Tension is put in when you use separate equations for each mass.

You do have another force to add to Ff acting on m1 - the component of the force of gravity that is acting down the ramp.
 
Doc Al said:
Rather than attempt to treat both masses together in one equation from the outset, analyze the forces acting on each mass separately. Apply Newton's 2nd law to each, then combine the two equations to solve for the acceleration.
when you say combine do you mean equate or add the two equations??
Here i equated by isolating T and substituting into the other equation.

so for mass1:
Fnet = ma
ma = T-(downsloping component of gravity) - Ff
= T- 14.7sin35 - 5.88
T = (1.5)a +2.55

for mass2:
Fnet = ma
mg - T = ma
T = mg - ma
T = 29.4 - 3a

then:

29.4 - 3a = (1.5)a + 2.55
a = 5.97 m/s^2

does that seem right?
 
tascja said:
when you say combine do you mean equate or add the two equations??
I just meant solve them simultaneously. There are several ways to do that. (Adding them to eliminate T might be the easiest.)
Here i equated by isolating T and substituting into the other equation.
Perfectly fine.

so for mass1:
Fnet = ma
ma = T-(downsloping component of gravity) - Ff
Good.
= T- 14.7sin35 - 5.88
T = (1.5)a +2.55
How did you solve for the friction?

for mass2:
Fnet = ma
mg - T = ma
T = mg - ma
T = 29.4 - 3a
Good.

then:

29.4 - 3a = (1.5)a + 2.55
a = 5.97 m/s^2

does that seem right?
Right idea, but check your numbers.
 
How did you solve for the friction?
** sorry i don't know where i got 5.88 from?? but i think it should be:
in the question it told me that the coefficient of friction is 0.40.
Ff = μFn

Fn = 14.7cos35
= 12.04 N

Ff = (12.04)(0.4)
= 4.816 N
 
tascja said:
** sorry i don't know where i got 5.88 from?? but i think it should be:
in the question it told me that the coefficient of friction is 0.40.
Ff = μFn

Fn = 14.7cos35
= 12.04 N

Ff = (12.04)(0.4)
= 4.816 N
Much better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K