Why Is Tension Equal in a Frictionless and Massless Pulley System?

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless and massless pulley system, tension is constant throughout the rope, meaning the tension (T) pulling both masses m and M is equal. This equality arises from Newton's third law, where the force exerted by one mass on the other is matched by an equal and opposite force. If the pulley has mass or friction, the tension would differ on either side due to additional forces acting on the system. When mass M is greater than mass m, it will fall, causing mass m to rise, but the tension remains the same. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing pulley systems accurately.
jasonpeng
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I've got a problem with understanding the pulley system.

In a basic pulley, if the force pulling M upwards is T, and the force pulling m upwards is also T, why is it that T is equal for both m & M? For some reason I feel inclined to believe that the T pulling m upwards is equal to the weight of M, and the T pulling M upwards is equal to the weight of m. Is that right or wrong? Why?
pulleyFBD.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe this relates to Newton's third law. If mass m is pulling on mass M with a certain force, M must be pulling on m with the same magnitude since the tension in the rope must be constant (ignoring friction).

Imagine an object hanging from the ceiling. The mass of the object itself would influence the magnitude of the upward force which is being exerted on the mass by the rope (the tension). This is because the magnitude of the force which the mass applies on the ceiling is the same as that which the ceiling applies on the mass. The same should hold true for the pulley (the force which m applies on M is the same magnitude as that which M applies on m).

I hope all of this was both correct and clear.
 
Last edited:
jasonpeng said:
I've got a problem with understanding the pulley system.

In a basic pulley, if the force pulling M upwards is T, and the force pulling m upwards is also T, why is it that T is equal for both m & M? For some reason I feel inclined to believe that the T pulling m upwards is equal to the weight of M, and the T pulling M upwards is equal to the weight of m. Is that right or wrong? Why?
View attachment 205103

If you fixed the top of the string, then you would have equilibrium. The tension on the right would support mass M and the tension on the left would suppose mass m.

However, if the string is not attached to anything (and there is no friction on the pulley), then the tension must be constant throughout. In this case, assuming mass M is larger, it will fall and pull the lower mass m upwards.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
PeroK said:
However, if the string is not attached to anything (and there is no friction on the pulley), then the tension must be constant throughout. In this case, assuming mass M is larger, it will fall and pull the lower mass m upwards.

This is correct, provided that the pulley is massless. If there is mass, and more specifically a mass moment of inertia for the pulley, the tensions will not be equal on both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, person123 and PeroK
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top