Tension in a deformed cylindrical bag on a surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tension in a deformed cylindrical bag made of a freely deformable fabric, impermeable to air, with a surface mass density denoted as σ. The key equation derived is T = σgx + T₀, where T is the tension in the fabric, x is the height above the floor, and T₀ is the tension at the contact point with the surface. The participants explore force balance equations, including horizontal and vertical components, to validate this relationship and clarify the definitions of angles involved in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tension in materials, particularly in fabric structures.
  • Familiarity with force balance equations in physics.
  • Knowledge of basic calculus, particularly in relation to differential equations.
  • Concept of pressure distribution within a deformable medium.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tension equations in deformable materials.
  • Learn about the mechanics of fabric under tension and pressure.
  • Explore the application of differential equations in force balance problems.
  • Investigate the properties of materials under varying pressure conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and material scientists interested in the mechanics of deformable structures, particularly those working with fabric materials in applications such as inflatable devices or soft robotics.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
See image below
Relevant Equations
Force balance (Alternatively, virtual work)
A cylindrical bag is made from a freely deformable fabric, impermeable for air, which has surface mass density σ; its perimeter L is much less than its length ##l##. If this bag is filled with air, it resembles a sausage. The bag is laid on a horizontal smooth floor (coefficient of friction µ = 0). The excess pressure inside the bag is p, the free fall acceleration g. The density of air is negligible.

Prove that the tension in the bag's fabric T = αx + β, where x is the height of the given point P above the floor, and find the coefficient α. Hint: consider the force balance for a small piece of fabric (using the vertical cut shown infigure below).

Remark: fabric's tension is (loosely speaking) the force per unit length. Actually, fabric's tension is not as simple concept as a rope's tension, because different force directions are possible; here, however, we neglect the force component along the sausage's axis. Thus, we can describe the fabric's tension here with a single number, the force per unit length T acting across a horizontal cut of the sausage.

Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 11.10.39 AM.png

There is a virtual work solution which shows that ##T = \sigma gx + T_0##, where ##T_0## is the tension of the fabric where it contacts the surface, ie tension along part 'c' of the above figure. I am however unsure as to how to use force balance to solve this. My attempt is as such:

Knowing that ##T_0## is involved, I consider a portion of the fabric from the contact surface up till a certain height x. Let the end of this portion form an angle ##\theta## with respect to the vertical. Note: In the above diagram, ##\theta## will be an *obtuse* angle.

(1) Horizontal pressures must balance, so ##T cos \theta + p(x) = T_0##.
(2) Assuming that the deformation is minimal, the cylinder largely resembles a circle, so ##cos \theta = \frac {r - x} {r}##, where ##r## is the radius of the circle.
(3) Vertical force balance shows that: ##T sin \theta## = Weight + pressure downwards, so ##T sin \theta = \sigma gr\theta + p\sqrt {r^2 - (r - x)^2}##
(4) How does everything reduce to the solution ##T = \sigma gx + T_0##, or is there an alternative, simpler method (which I think there should be)?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##\theta## is an angle to the vertical then the horizontal component would be ##\sin(\theta)##, no?
 
haruspex said:
If ##\theta## is an angle to the vertical then the horizontal component would be ##\sin(\theta)##, no?
##\theta## is the angle swept out from the base of the cylinder to the fabric at height x. Under my definition of ##\theta##, ##\theta## will be an obtuse angle in the provided diagram.
 
The horizontal force balance seems incorrect to me. I get $$T_0 \cos{\theta}+T_0=px$$where p is uniform inside the fabric, and independent of x.
 
Chestermiller said:
The horizontal force balance seems incorrect to me. I get $$T_0 \cos{\theta}+T_0=px$$where p is uniform inside the fabric, and independent of x.
This has to do with your definition of ##\theta##. I defined ##\theta## to be the angle swept out from the bottom of the cylinder, so under my definition, in the diagram in #1, ##\theta## is obtuse.
 
phantomvommand said:
This has to do with your definition of ##\theta##. I defined ##\theta## to be the angle swept out from the bottom of the cylinder, so under my definition, in the diagram in #1, ##\theta## is obtuse.
I defined theta as the angle the fabric makes with the horizontal. Do you agree that p is uniform within the fabric cylinder?
 
Chestermiller said:
I defined theta as the angle the fabric makes with the horizontal. Do you agree that p is uniform within the fabric cylinder?
Yes, p is uniform. but I do not see how the equations can be reduced to the text’s solution.
 
Chestermiller said:
The horizontal force balance seems incorrect to me. I get $$T_0 \cos{\theta}+T_0=px$$where p is uniform inside the fabric, and independent of x.
I think @phantomvommand intended p(x) to indicate a product, not a function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand
haruspex said:
I think @phantomvommand intended p(x) to indicate a product, not a function.
@Chestermiller yep, I meant px as a product Your equation is correct, though of course under a different definition of theta.
 
  • #10
phantomvommand said:
I do not see how the equations can be reduced to the text’s solution.
Combining your equation with the target equation produces the relationship between x and θ, so in principle determines the shape of the cylinder. Therefore it is not possible to obtain the target equation from yours. If it can be done at all, it must be from some other starting point.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
The first step in this problem should be to show that the curved section of the fabric is a perfect circle.
But is it?
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
But is it?
No. My mistake.
 
  • #13
Let ##\phi## be the angle that the fabric contour makes with the positive x axis and let ds represent the differential distance along the fabric contour. Then the unit tangent vector along the contour is $$\mathbf{i}_s=\mathbf{i_x}\cos\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\sin\phi$$and the vector force balance on the arc of fabric between s and ##s+ds## is: $$\frac{d(T\mathbf{i}_s)}{ds}-\alpha g\mathbf{i}_y-p\mathbf{i}_n=\mathbf{0}$$where ##\mathbf{i}_n## is the unit normal to the contour: $$\mathbf{i}_n=-\mathbf{i_x}\sin\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\cos\phi$$In terms of components tangential and normal to the contour, this equation becomes: $$\frac{dT}{ds}=\alpha g \sin\phi$$and$$T\frac{d\phi}{ds}-\alpha g \cos{\phi}=p$$
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny and phantomvommand
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
Let ##\phi## be the angle that the fabric contour makes with the positive x axis and let ds represent the differential distance along the fabric contour. Then the unit tangent vector along the contour is $$\mathbf{i}_s=\mathbf{i_x}\cos\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\sin\phi$$and the vector force balance on the arc of fabric between s and ##s+ds## is: $$\frac{d(T\mathbf{i}_s)}{ds}-\alpha g\mathbf{i}_y-p\mathbf{i}_n=\mathbf{0}$$where ##\mathbf{i}_n## is the unit normal to the contour: $$\mathbf{i}_n=-\mathbf{i_x}\sin\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\cos\phi$$In terms of components tangential and normal to the contour, this equation becomes: $$\frac{dT}{ds}=\alpha g \sin\phi$$and$$T\frac{d\phi}{ds}-\alpha g \cos{\phi}=p$$
Thanks. I've used the tangential equation to obtain the text's solution, with the approximation ##s \sim r\phi##. However, I am curious about how you obtained the normal equation. I get that the quantity ##p + \sigma gcos\phi## must be balanced, but I do not see how it is balanced by ##T \frac {d\phi} {ds}##
 
  • #15
What is the definition of T? That will tell you.
 
  • #16
phantomvommand said:
Thanks. I've used the tangential equation to obtain the text's solution, with the approximation ##s \sim r\phi##. However, I am curious about how you obtained the normal equation. I get that the quantity ##p + \sigma gcos\phi## must be balanced, but I do not see how it is balanced by ##T \frac {d\phi} {ds}##
The tangential unit vector is changing direction along the fabric contour, and this results in a normal component of force on the fabric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand and hutchphd
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
The tangential unit vector is changing direction along the fabric contour, and this results in a normal component of force on the fabric.
I currently see ##T \frac {d\phi} {ds}## as normal force = ##Td\phi##, and this is spread over ds. Is this how it should be seen, or is there a way to see it as ##\frac {d\phi} {ds}## multiplied by T? Also, I think the it balances ##p\sigma + \sigma gcos\phi##
 
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
Let ##\phi## be the angle that the fabric contour makes with the positive x axis and let ds represent the differential distance along the fabric contour. Then the unit tangent vector along the contour is $$\mathbf{i}_s=\mathbf{i_x}\cos\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\sin\phi$$and the vector force balance on the arc of fabric between s and ##s+ds## is: $$\frac{d(T\mathbf{i}_s)}{ds}-\alpha g\mathbf{i}_y-p\mathbf{i}_n=\mathbf{0}$$where ##\mathbf{i}_n## is the unit normal to the contour: $$\mathbf{i}_n=-\mathbf{i_x}\sin\phi+\mathbf{i_y}\cos\phi$$In terms of components tangential and normal to the contour, this equation becomes: $$\frac{dT}{ds}=\alpha g \sin\phi$$and$$T\frac{d\phi}{ds}-\alpha g \cos{\phi}=p$$
This is very nice!

You used the symbol ##\alpha## for the mass density ##\sigma##. So, your next to last equation can be written as $$\frac{dT}{ds}=\sigma g \sin\phi$$
It is easy to use this equation to derive the result for ##T## as a function of vertical height.
 
  • #19
phantomvommand said:
I currently see ##T \frac {d\phi} {ds}## as normal force = ##Td\phi##, and this is spread over ds. Is this how it should be seen, or is there a way to see it as ##\frac {d\phi} {ds}## multiplied by T? Also, I think the it balances ##p\sigma + \sigma gcos\phi##
p is not multiplied by ##\sigma##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
581
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K