Tension particle between two strings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mechanics problem involving the calculation of tension in a string with a mass fixed at its midpoint. There is confusion regarding the textbook's answer, which suggests that tension approaches zero when the distance between the ends of the string is zero, contradicting the expected centripetal force. Participants debate the interpretation of "tension X acting between the ends of the string," with some arguing it should refer to axial tension rather than the resultant tension. The distinction between axial and radial tension is clarified, emphasizing that axial tension aligns with the distance x, while radial tension is perpendicular. Overall, the consensus is that the problem's wording is ambiguous and could lead to misinterpretation.
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement



While going over the exercises in my mechanics tutoring sheet I found that one of the problems' stated answer didn't make sense to me (it's apparently from a textbook):

A weight of mass ##m## is fixed to the middle point of a string of length ##l## as shown in the figure [see attachment] and rotates about an axis joining the ends of the string. The system is in contact with its environment at a temperature ##T##. Calculate the tension ##X## acting between the ends of the string in terms of its dependence upon the distance ##x## between the ends.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##\theta## be the angle either string makes with ##x##. By symmetry ##\theta## has to be the same for both strings and so too must the tension. We have ##\cos\theta = \frac{x}{l}## and ##\sin\theta = \frac{2 r}{l}## where ##r## is the radius of the circular trajectory. Then ##2X \sin\theta = \frac{mv^2}{r} = \frac{2mv^2}{l \sin\theta}## so ##X = \frac{mv^2}{l (1 - \cos^2\theta)} = \frac{mv^2 l}{l^2 - x^2} = 2K \frac{l}{l^2 - x^2}## where ##K## is the kinetic energy. Using the equipartition theorem we then have that the average tension in either string is ##\langle X \rangle = k_B T \frac{l}{l^2 - x^2}##.

The answer however is apparently supposed to be ##\langle X \rangle = k_B T \frac{x}{l^2 - x^2}##. But how can this be? This would imply that for ##x = 0## there is no tension in either string which is obviously not true. The tension in either string for ##x = 0## should be ##\frac{mv^2}{l}## as this is exactly half of the centripetal force ##\frac{mv^2}{l/2}##.

My other issue is, the problem statement says "calculate the tension ##X## acting between the ends of the string...". How can someone possibly infer from this that the problem wants the thermal average ##\langle X \rangle## for an ensemble of such systems and not just the actual tension ##X## for anyone copy of the system? Is one to infer it from the lack of specification of the angular velocity ##\omega## of the particle together with the specification of the temperature ##T## of the heat bath?
 

Attachments

  • problem statement string.png
    problem statement string.png
    11.2 KB · Views: 588
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks right to me, as well as producing the correct limits. The book's answer can't be right given your argument. And yes, the book should have asked for an ensemble average since there is no one unique tension, given the variables given in the problem.
 
WannabeNewton said:
Calculate the tension ##X## acting between the ends of the string in terms of its dependence upon the distance ##x## between the ends.
My reading of this is that it is asking for an axial tension.

WannabeNewton said:
Then ##2X \sin\theta = \frac{mv^2}{r}##
Here you find the radial tension.

WannabeNewton said:
This would imply that for ##x = 0## there is no tension in either string which is obviously not true. The tension in either string for ##x = 0## should be ##\frac{mv^2}{l}## as this is exactly half of the centripetal force ##\frac{mv^2}{l/2}##.

For x = 0 there would be no axial tension, only radial tension.
Also, ##\frac{mv^2}{l}##is exactly double the centripetal force ##\frac{mv^2}{l/2}##.
 
jackwhirl said:
My reading of this is that it is asking for an axial tension.

What is axial vs. radial tension?

jackwhirl said:
Also, ##\frac{mv^2}{l}##is exactly double the centripetal force ##\frac{mv^2}{l/2}##.

No it isn't. ##\frac{mv^2}{l/2} = \frac{2mv^2}{l}## is double ##\frac{mv^2}{l}## not the other way around.
 
Ah. Missed the division symbol there. Sorry.

Anyway, axial tension would be the component of the tension in line with x. The radial tension would be the component of the tension in line with the radius, perpendicular to the axis.
 
jackwhirl said:
Anyway, axial tension would be the component of the tension in line with x. The radial tension would be the component of the tension in line with the radius, perpendicular to the axis.

I see, thanks. Well if the problem wants the axial tension then that would certainly give the required result. But how does a person reading the problem go about interpreting the statement "find the tension ##X## acting between the ends of the string" as "find the component of the tension in either segment of the string along ##x##" as opposed to "find the resultant tension in either segment of the string" which is what I calculated above, or even "find the net tension in the string"?

By "segment" I mean one of the two halves of the string in the depicted diagram since the problem considers the two joint half segments to be the entire string.
 
The only consistent definition of tension is along the direction of the string itself. If the problem wanted you to project this vector along the x-axis, it would have to explicitly say that. I do not agree that the problem is asking for this.
 
Matterwave said:
The only consistent definition of tension is along the direction of the string itself.

This is how I read the problem as well so I went about calculating the tension along either half of the string.

Thank you for your earlier reply by the way.

Matterwave said:
If the problem wanted you to project this vector along the x-axis, it would have to explicitly say that. I do not agree that the problem is asking for this.

If it was ambiguous to me then it might be ambiguous to the students as well so I will definitely be more clear when giving them the problem.
 
WannabeNewton said:
This is how I read the problem as well so I went about calculating the tension along either half of the string.

Thank you for your earlier reply by the way.



If it was ambiguous to me then it might be ambiguous to the students as well so I will definitely be more clear when giving them the problem.

It also physically makes no sense to me why you want to search for the x-projection.
 
Back
Top