Tension same at both ends of the string?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkBlitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the tension in a string connecting two masses is the same at both ends. It is clarified that if the string is massless and connects two blocks directly, the tension remains constant throughout. The scenario involves three different masses: m1 and m2 on a table, and m3 hanging off the side, all connected and accelerating. The participants confirm that the tension experienced by m1 due to m2 and m3 is equal to the tension at m2 due to m1. Overall, the tension in a massless string remains consistent between connected masses.
DarkBlitz
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have a question on if the tension on either end of a string is equal. For example, if there are 3 blocks of different mass, one hanging of the side of the table and two on the top of the table, will the tension on the string from m1 to m2 be the same as the tension from m2 to m1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DarkBlitz said:
Hey, I have a question on if the tension on either end of a string is equal. For example, if there are 3 blocks of different mass, one hanging of the side of the table and two on the top of the table, will the tension on the string from m1 to m2 be the same as the tension from m2 to m1?
Not quite sure what you mean. If the string is massless, and the string connects two blocks without anything intervening, then yes, the tension is the same throughout.

What's the exact scenario? Describe it more clearly.
 
ok, sorry, there are 3 masses, m1, m2 ,m3, all different.
m1 and m2 are on a table top, and m3 is hanging freely of the side of the table. they are all connected and are accelerating.

my question is: is the tension at m1 due to m2 and m3 the same as the tension at m2 due to m1?
 
DarkBlitz said:
ok, sorry, there are 3 masses, m1, m2 ,m3, all different.
m1 and m2 are on a table top, and m3 is hanging freely of the side of the table. they are all connected and are accelerating.

my question is: is the tension at m1 due to m2 and m3 the same as the tension at m2 due to m1?
Is this an accurate description?:

m1 and m2, on the table top, are connected by a massless string; m2 is connected to hanging mass m3 by a massless string.

If so, then sure, the tension force due to the string connecting m1 and m2 is the same on both masses.
 
thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top