MHB Tensor Algebras and Graded Algebras - Cooperstein - Theorem 10.11 and Defn 10.7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.3 The Tensor Algebra ... ...

I need help in order to get an understanding of an aspect of Example 10.11 and Definition 10.7 in Section 10.3 ...

The relevant text in Cooperstein is as follows:View attachment 5565
View attachment 5566My questions related to the above text from Cooperstein are simple and related ... they are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Cooperstein ... at the start of the proof of Theorem 10.11 we read the following:

" ... ... Define a map $$S^k \ : \ V^k \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}$$ by

$$S^k (v_1, \ ... \ ... \ , v_k ) = S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$

... ... ... "


My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$ ... ... ?
Question 2

In the above text from Cooperstein in Definition 10.7 we read the following:

" ... ... An algebra $$\mathcal{A}$$ is said to be $$\mathbb{Z}$$-graded if it is the internal direct sum of subspaces $$\mathcal{A}_k , k \in \mathbb{Z}$$ such that

$$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l \subset \mathcal{A}_{k + l}$$

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.3 The Tensor Algebra ... ...

I need help in order to get an understanding of an aspect of Example 10.11 and Definition 10.7 in Section 10.3 ...

The relevant text in Cooperstein is as follows:
My questions related to the above text from Cooperstein are simple and related ... they are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Cooperstein ... at the start of the proof of Theorem 10.11 we read the following:

" ... ... Define a map $$S^k \ : \ V^k \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}$$ by

$$S^k (v_1, \ ... \ ... \ , v_k ) = S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$

... ... ... "


My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$ ... ... ?

It is the product in the algebra $\mathcal{A}$ (recall an algebra has a "dual nature" as both an $R$-module *and* a ring, such that the ring multiplication is *compatible* with the module addition, AND the ring-action of $R$-this is why we require $R$-bilinearity. In addition, we require that $R$ commute with $\mathcal{A}$-that is, that $R \subseteq Z(\mathcal{A})$, the center of $\mathcal{A}$).
Question 2

In the above text from Cooperstein in Definition 10.7 we read the following:

" ... ... An algebra $$\mathcal{A}$$ is said to be $$\mathbb{Z}$$-graded if it is the internal direct sum of subspaces $$\mathcal{A}_k , k \in \mathbb{Z}$$ such that

$$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l \subset \mathcal{A}_{k + l}$$

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter

The set $\mathcal{A}_k\mathcal{A}_l = \{a \in \mathcal{A}: a = a_ka_l, a_k \in \mathcal{A}_k,a_l \in \mathcal{A}_l\}$ (it's just a "product set").
 
Deveno said:
It is the product in the algebra $\mathcal{A}$ (recall an algebra has a "dual nature" as both an $R$-module *and* a ring, such that the ring multiplication is *compatible* with the module addition, AND the ring-action of $R$-this is why we require $R$-bilinearity. In addition, we require that $R$ commute with $\mathcal{A}$-that is, that $R \subseteq Z(\mathcal{A})$, the center of $\mathcal{A}$).The set $\mathcal{A}_k\mathcal{A}_l = \{a \in \mathcal{A}: a = a_ka_l, a_k \in \mathcal{A}_k,a_l \in \mathcal{A}_l\}$ (it's just a "product set").
Thanks Deveno ... appreciate the clarification ... most helpful ...

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top