MHB Tensor Algebras and Graded Algebras - Cooperstein - Theorem 10.11 and Defn 10.7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.3 The Tensor Algebra ... ...

I need help in order to get an understanding of an aspect of Example 10.11 and Definition 10.7 in Section 10.3 ...

The relevant text in Cooperstein is as follows:View attachment 5565
View attachment 5566My questions related to the above text from Cooperstein are simple and related ... they are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Cooperstein ... at the start of the proof of Theorem 10.11 we read the following:

" ... ... Define a map $$S^k \ : \ V^k \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}$$ by

$$S^k (v_1, \ ... \ ... \ , v_k ) = S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$

... ... ... "


My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$ ... ... ?
Question 2

In the above text from Cooperstein in Definition 10.7 we read the following:

" ... ... An algebra $$\mathcal{A}$$ is said to be $$\mathbb{Z}$$-graded if it is the internal direct sum of subspaces $$\mathcal{A}_k , k \in \mathbb{Z}$$ such that

$$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l \subset \mathcal{A}_{k + l}$$

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

I am focused on Section 10.3 The Tensor Algebra ... ...

I need help in order to get an understanding of an aspect of Example 10.11 and Definition 10.7 in Section 10.3 ...

The relevant text in Cooperstein is as follows:
My questions related to the above text from Cooperstein are simple and related ... they are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Cooperstein ... at the start of the proof of Theorem 10.11 we read the following:

" ... ... Define a map $$S^k \ : \ V^k \longrightarrow \mathcal{A}$$ by

$$S^k (v_1, \ ... \ ... \ , v_k ) = S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$

... ... ... "


My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$S(v_1) S(v_2) \ ... \ ... \ S(v_k)$$ ... ... ?

It is the product in the algebra $\mathcal{A}$ (recall an algebra has a "dual nature" as both an $R$-module *and* a ring, such that the ring multiplication is *compatible* with the module addition, AND the ring-action of $R$-this is why we require $R$-bilinearity. In addition, we require that $R$ commute with $\mathcal{A}$-that is, that $R \subseteq Z(\mathcal{A})$, the center of $\mathcal{A}$).
Question 2

In the above text from Cooperstein in Definition 10.7 we read the following:

" ... ... An algebra $$\mathcal{A}$$ is said to be $$\mathbb{Z}$$-graded if it is the internal direct sum of subspaces $$\mathcal{A}_k , k \in \mathbb{Z}$$ such that

$$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l \subset \mathcal{A}_{k + l}$$

... ... ... "My question is ... what is the form and nature of the multiplication involved between the elements in the product $$\mathcal{A}_k \mathcal{A}_l$$ ... ... ?Hope someone can help ...

Peter

The set $\mathcal{A}_k\mathcal{A}_l = \{a \in \mathcal{A}: a = a_ka_l, a_k \in \mathcal{A}_k,a_l \in \mathcal{A}_l\}$ (it's just a "product set").
 
Deveno said:
It is the product in the algebra $\mathcal{A}$ (recall an algebra has a "dual nature" as both an $R$-module *and* a ring, such that the ring multiplication is *compatible* with the module addition, AND the ring-action of $R$-this is why we require $R$-bilinearity. In addition, we require that $R$ commute with $\mathcal{A}$-that is, that $R \subseteq Z(\mathcal{A})$, the center of $\mathcal{A}$).The set $\mathcal{A}_k\mathcal{A}_l = \{a \in \mathcal{A}: a = a_ka_l, a_k \in \mathcal{A}_k,a_l \in \mathcal{A}_l\}$ (it's just a "product set").
Thanks Deveno ... appreciate the clarification ... most helpful ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K