Tensor: Definition, Examples & n,m Meaning

  • Thread starter Thread starter subsonicman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Tensor
subsonicman
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was reading this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor
which said the definition of a tensor was a relation between two vectors. I then went down to the examples section and it had some sort of (n,m) notation. I had some theories on what they meant but none of them made sense. What do n and m represent?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##n## is just the number of products of ##V^{*}## and ##m## is the number of products of ##V## which comprise the domain of the map; the codomain is just the reals.
 
subsonicman said:
which said the definition of a tensor was a relation between two vectors.

That is hardly true, a tensor is a linear object which maps n vectors and m one-forms into real numbers, and transforms in a coordinate invariant manner.
That is like saying multiplication is defined as a relation between two numbers.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top