Tensor Densities: Coordinate Independent Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter dEdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
Is there a coordinate independent/geometric definition of a tensor density?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a set of quantities V={v} that obey the axioms of a vector space. This automatically implies that there is some notion of scaling them, v\rightarrow\alpha v. For comparison, you also have the vector space of infinitesimal displacements T={dx}, i.e., the tangent space. To talk about whether V is a space made of pure tensors or tensor densities, I think you need additional information that tells you how transformations on T relate to transformations on V. For example, if rotations and boosts act the same way on T and V, but a scaling by α on T corresponds to a scaling by α2 on V, then you know that V is a space of tensor densities, not pure tensors. This additional information could be purely geometrical and based on some construction of V's elements out of T's elements (e.g., elements of V could describe areas), in which case that's how you'd know how to correlate the scaling behaviors. Or the comparative behavior under scaling could be fixed by some physical rather than geometrical consideration, e.g., elements of V could describe the mass per unit area in a 2-surface, which has different scaling behavior than the charge per unit area.
 
Okay, follow up question: how would I show that the charge 4-current is a tensor density?
 
Have you already established that current density is a pure vector?
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top