If t is the term x*y*z of the language for group theory, why is x*y not a subterm of t? isn't (x*y)*z = x*(y*z) = x*y*z, meaning that x*y is a subterm by definition?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Terms of a language

Loading...

Similar Threads - Terms language | Date |
---|---|

A Two interaction terms | Jun 22, 2017 |

I What "language" means in Kolmogorov complexity? | Jun 10, 2016 |

And - Or - Not in terms of one another | Dec 22, 2015 |

Simplifying a 4-term equation using boolean algebra | Sep 12, 2015 |

Terms for addable variables | Jan 20, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**