Testing Phenotypic Ratios: Results of Chi Square Test

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on testing phenotypic ratios using the Chi Square test to determine if observed ratios significantly differ from expected 1:1 ratios. The results for three crosses show chi-square values of 217, 715, and 642, all with a probability of 0.000, indicating significant differences. It is suggested that the expected values should be recalculated based on a total observation count, as the initial calculations may not accurately reflect the 1:1 expectation. The importance of comparing actual observed values to the expected values for accurate analysis is emphasized. Accurate Chi-square calculations are crucial for valid conclusions in genetic studies.
jena
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hi,
My Question:
Problem 1. The expected phenotypic ratios for each of the crosses below is 1:1. Determine whether the observed ratios are differ significantly (p < 0.05) from the expected.
View attachment Table 1.doc
I used a Chi Square test to help me determine that answer and found the there is no probability of any of them correct.
Answers:
•Let’s first examine white eyed females to red-eyed males
o We found that X2: Results
o 2 data/expectation pairs (x,E):
( 225. , 433.0 ); ( 208. , 433.0 );
o chi-square = 217.
degrees of freedom = 1
probability = 0.000​
• Next we examined Red-eyed females to eosin eyed males
o We found that X2: Results
o 2 data/expectation pairs (x,E):
( 679. , 1426. ); ( 747. , 1426. );
o chi-square = 715. degrees of freedom = 1 probability = 0.000​
• Finally we examined Eosin-eyed females to white eyed females
o We found that X2: Results
o 2 data/expectation pairs (x,E):
( 694. , 1273. ); ( 579. , 1273. );
o chi-square = 642.
degrees of freedom = 1
probability = 0.000​
Does answer seem correct?
Thank You:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jena said:
•Let’s first examine white eyed females to red-eyed males
o We found that X2: Results
o 2 data/expectation pairs (x,E):
( 225. , 433.0 ); ( 208. , 433.0 );
o chi-square = 217.
degrees of freedom = 1
probability = 0.000​
I think we can just go through one of these, and then you can follow the same concept for all of them. You want to compare your data (actual or observed values) to the expected values for a given trait. Your total number of observations (n) is 433, but that's not your expected value. If you are predicting a 1:1 ratio, that means you're expecting 50% to be of each trait (if ratios don't make a lot of sense to you, deal a deck of cards into two piles...for every 1 you put in pile A, put 1 in pile B...what percentage of the deck of cards is in pile A?). So, your expected value for either trait is going to be 50% of the total number of observations. That should change your outcome substantially if you redo your Chi-squared calculations with that information.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top