Solid State Textbook on crystal field theory and degeneracy breaking

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between group theory, crystal field symmetries, and the breaking of degeneracies of orbitals. A participant seeks resources that bridge these concepts, having completed graduate courses in condensed matter and quantum mechanics. Recommendations include using general inorganic chemistry textbooks for foundational knowledge, with a specific mention of Albert Cotton’s “Chemical Applications of Group Theory” for deeper insights. The consensus suggests that a comprehensive understanding can be achieved without needing an entire book dedicated solely to the topic.
vancouver_water
Messages
76
Reaction score
10
In particular I would like to have a resource for the relation between group theory, crystal field symmetries and breaking of degeneracies of orbitals.

I've taken a graduate condensed matter course and graduate quantum mechanics courses. I have some basic knowledge of group theory but can learn what I need if the book has more group theory pre requisites.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don’t know if you need a whole book on it. The basics can be found in pretty much any decent inorganic chemistry book. Albert Cotton’s “Chemical Applications of Group Theory” goes into somewhat more depth.
 
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll check it out.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top