Thank God for "In Other Words...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jammin_James
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the challenges students face when trying to comprehend technical explanations in textbooks, particularly in subjects like math and physics. Many participants express that they often struggle until simpler phrases or examples clarify complex concepts. There's a consensus that while precision in definitions is important, students typically need additional context or examples to grasp the material fully. The conversation also touches on the role of confidence in understanding; as students engage more with the subject matter, their confidence grows, leading to better comprehension. Additionally, using multiple textbooks for varied explanations can enhance understanding. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of reassurance and practice in mastering complex academic language.
Jammin_James
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
"In other words... "

Thank god for that phrase.

Is it just me or can no one else understand something explained in a textbook in a more technical manner?

Usually my brain is on the verge of exploding until that phrase pops up or an example is presented. After that I'm like, "Oh! That's what they're saying".

I understand the need to be precise... but is the typical student supposed to understand these definitions like a first language?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Example? In math at least, most definitions are expected to be understood by the reader without further explanation beyond perhaps a couple examples or a clarifying statement to make it clear why you are interested in the definition
 


A big part of maths education is about learning how to read texts like that.
 


I know where you're coming from though, especially with physics texts. I find it extremely hard to comprehend their explanations, and usually require a teacher's reiteration.
 


I'm also like that. I find it difficult to learn math deductively, and I always need a few examples. Also one thing that helps is to buy different textbooks to have different explanations of the same thing.
 


This is more an issue of confidence in the topic than the language. Certainly there is the odd text where the author has either intentionally obscured his train of thought so you are left to believe "How the hell did he do that?!" or the author is simply incapable of communicating their ideas in any other way. (See some of Weiner's mathematical papers...). But in most cases that's simply the language that is used to communicate the ideas.

It really comes down to a lack of confidence in yourself and your ability to understand the material. The more you work in the field the more that goes away. I know for a long time I never felt confident that I had gotten the whole picture until I had someone else (a professor for ex.) tell me exactly what I was thinking. Its simply that reassurance that you haven't missed somthing vital that makes the understanding set in.

In other words... the more you work at it the more understanding you develop for what the language means. Once the confidence is there, everything flows like wine... or with wine... something like that.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top