Thank You to My Academic Helpers - Grades A in Physics & A- in Chemistry

  • Thread starter Thread starter toothpaste666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thank you
AI Thread Summary
The user expresses gratitude for the support received from the forum, which contributed to achieving an A in physics and an A- in chemistry. They emphasize the importance of guidance in understanding complex subjects, noting that the forum's approach helped them identify and learn from their mistakes. The user acknowledges their own effort in the learning process, highlighting that true understanding comes from working through problems independently. They appreciate the effective teaching method used in the forum, which encourages critical thinking rather than rote memorization. The discussion underscores the value of collaborative learning in academic success.
toothpaste666
Messages
516
Reaction score
20
I apologize if this is not the correct place to post this, but I just wanted to make sure the people who have been helping me see it. I just got my grades back for the semester and I got an A in physics and an A- in chemistry. I can't take full credit for this, because if It wasn't for the people on this site, I'm not sure if I would have done as well. You guys walking me through my mistakes in solving problems has allowed me to understand the subject matter in a way that I would not have been able to do without guidance and my teacher certainly was not the guidance I needed. Thank you all so much for helping us out and taking the time out of your day to do so despite not getting paid. You guys are the best.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100, x2017, BiGyElLoWhAt and 5 others
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the most important PF HH rules is that the OP has to do the bulk of the work. Glad that the PF system worked so well for you. Congrats, and keep up the great work yourself! :-)
 
  • Like
Likes toothpaste666
Well done toothpaste!
 
  • Like
Likes toothpaste666
thank you!
 
Well done! I am happy you found good advice here. With the risk of sounding very cliché: You might have gotten some good maps and advice on how to tackle the more difficult parts of the path, but in the end it is you who had to walk it. Do not underestimate your own contribution to your success!
 
  • Like
Likes toothpaste666
I think the method of teaching here is incredibly effective. Without this site I would have hit a roadblock on the first thing I got stuck on, or I would have learned things incorrectly without even realizing it and carried this misinformation into the future. On the other hand if this site just gave me all the answers, I would be able to look at the solution to the problem, but may or may not understand why it was solved the way it was and I probably wouldn't be able to solve it on my own without being able to look at the solution. The way things are done here is the best because you point out the area where the mistake is so I know where to focus on and you give just enough information that I should be able to figure it out for myself. That is the only way something can truly click for me is if I come to the conclusion myself. That way I truly understand WHY I have come to that conclusion, because I have worked it out myself instead of following someone else's work. success in physics doesn't depend on being able to step by step memorize a solution, because that won't work in all cases. But if you understand what the equations mean and why things work the way they do, you won't need to memorize anything. Thanks again everyone
 
  • Like
Likes ehild, Greg Bernhardt, PeroK and 3 others
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top