The acceleration of a descending airplane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of an airplane descending in a circular pattern with a constant radius of 250 meters, a horizontal speed of 75 m/s, and a downward speed of 5 m/s that increases at 2 m/s². The centripetal acceleration is calculated using the formula an = v² / ρ, while the total acceleration requires combining both horizontal and vertical components. Participants suggest using the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude of the overall acceleration vector. The challenge lies in incorporating the increasing downward acceleration into the calculations. The conversation emphasizes deriving the acceleration from first principles if needed.
deveny7
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An airplane descends in a circular pattern with a constant radius of 250 meters. The airplane has a horizontal speed of 75 m/s (constant) and a downward
speed of 5 m/s, which is increasing at a rate of 2 m/s2

Determine the acceleration of the airplane.


Homework Equations



an = v2 / ρ

a = √(at2 + an2)


The Attempt at a Solution



Finding the acceleration for a circular motion is easy, but I am having trouble including the downward acceleration. Any help is greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • MET 212.jpg
    MET 212.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
If all else fails, derive it from first principles.

Assuming that the aircraft is at height h and is circling the origin, can you write down its position as a function of time? If so, what's its acceleration?
 
What equation could I use to include the height and downward speed as a function of time?
 
deveny7 said:
Finding the acceleration for a circular motion is easy, but I am having trouble including the downward acceleration.
You figured out the centripetal accleration, and the problem states the downwards acceleration is 2 m / s2, which would be the components of the acceleration vector (horizontal and vertical). To get the magnitude, take the square root of the sum of the squares of the components.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top