The Age of Plate Tectonics: When Did It Begin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zankaon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Plate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Plate tectonics likely began around 4 billion years ago, as indicated by research from Hopkins et al. (2008) in the journal Nature, which discusses Hadean plate boundary interactions. The discussion also explores the geological history of Mars, suggesting that while Mars may have experienced plate tectonics in its early molten state, it currently lacks the necessary convection to sustain such activity. The findings highlight the differences in tectonic activity between Earth and Mars, particularly in relation to the size and heat dynamics of each planet.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hadean geological processes
  • Familiarity with plate tectonics concepts
  • Knowledge of Mars' geological history
  • Basic comprehension of geophysical principles related to planetary heat engines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Hadean era on early Earth geology
  • Study the geological features of Mars, focusing on Olympus Mons and Vallis Marineris
  • Examine the findings of the Mars Global Surveyor regarding Martian tectonics
  • Explore the differences in tectonic activity between terrestrial planets and their heat dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, planetary scientists, and anyone interested in the evolution of planetary tectonics, particularly those studying the geological history of Earth and Mars.

zankaon
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
When did plate tectonics start? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
zankaon said:
When did plate tectonics start? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics"

That's a bit of an open question; but it seems there are indications that it began very early; as much as 4 billion years ago. This is associated with new ideas about the "Hadean" (Hellish) era; it may not have been as diabolical as previously thought.

Here's an article from the NYT which discusses these ideas: A New Picture of the Early Earth. The relevant science article is
  • Hopkins, M. et. al. (2008) "Low heat flow inferred from >4 Gyr zircons suggests Hadean plate boundary interactions" in Nature 456, 493-496 (27 November 2008) doi:10.1038/nature07465

Cheers -- sylas
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zankaon said:
When did plate tectonics start? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics"

Perhaps a little at a time. Might south Pacific, with any example of colliding oceanic crust, with subducting, be suggestive? That is for 2 Archean brittle pieces colliding, with one somewhat cooler, and hence denser, might subduction occur? Might such localized process be occurring planet wide? Of course one could have ongoing mantle differentiating.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zankaon said:
When did plate tectonics start? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics"

Is perhaps Mars an example wherein plate tectonics never started? Might any uniformity (i.e. no layering) to Vallis Marineris walls be consistent with no plate tectonics there? Is Mar's major volcano Olympus Mons consistent with no plate motion on Mars? Might uniqueness of 1 major volcano on Mars relate to uniqueness of Hawaiian plume? That is, might respective persistence suggest an ancient impact, and ongoing active deep conduit system? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zankaon said:
Is perhaps Mars an example wherein plate tectonics never started?

Actually, Mars likely did have plate tectonics when it was young with a significantly molten interior. However, since Mars is so much smaller than earth, it has cooled off and there is no longer the convection necessary to move the plates.

NASA scientists have discovered additional evidence that Mars once underwent plate tectonics, slow movement of the planet's crust, like the present-day Earth. A new map of Mars' magnetic field made by the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft reveals a world whose history was shaped by great crustal plates being pulled apart or smashed together.

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2005/mgs_plates.html
 
If one thinks of Earth and Mars as heat engines, then the work they try to do is force x distance. In other words, resulting in plate motion. However the Mars heat engine (.3 Earth mass) would not seem sufficient to result in plate motion. The very large size of Olympus Mons would seem consistent with no plate motion.
 
... it would need to be correct or.. no cigar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
776
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K