The associated Laguerre equation.

  • Thread starter Thread starter raul_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laguerre
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the radial part of the hydrogen wave function, specifically the term L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1}(2ρ). The user encounters an issue where their derivation yields L_{n+1}^{2l+1}(2ρ) instead. The relevant equations include the definitions of Laguerre polynomials, L_{\alpha}(x) and L_{\alpha}^{\beta}(x), and the user attempts to manipulate these to reach the correct form. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving special functions and the potential for typographical errors in such calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly the hydrogen atom model
  • Familiarity with Laguerre polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications in physics
  • Experience with mathematical notation and manipulation of special functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Laguerre polynomials in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the derivation of the hydrogen wave function using spherical coordinates
  • Explore the differences between various definitions of Laguerre functions
  • Investigate common errors in deriving special functions and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working with atomic models, and mathematicians interested in special functions and their applications in physics.

raul_l
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I need to show that the radial part of the hydrogen wave function has the form
[tex]\rho^{l+1} e^{-\rho} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)[/tex]

More specifically, I'm having trouble showing the [tex]L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)[/tex] part because what I get is [tex]L_{n+1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)[/tex]. The derivation is relatively easy and it makes me furious that I'm unable to find the mistake.

Homework Equations



[tex]L_{\alpha} (x) = e^x \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dx^{\alpha}} (e^{-x}x^\alpha)[/tex]

[tex]L_{\alpha}^\beta (x) = \frac{d^{\beta}}{dx^{\beta}} L_{\alpha} (x) = \frac{d^{\beta}}{dx^{\beta}} (e^x \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dx^{\alpha}} (e^{-x}x^\alpha))[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



This equation should be correct:
[tex]\rho \frac{d^2}{d \rho^2} f(\rho) + 2(l+1-\rho) \frac{d}{d \rho} f(\rho) + (2n-2(l+1)) f(\rho) = 0[/tex]

Next I introduce the following parameters
[tex]\alpha = n+1[/tex]

[tex]\beta = 2l+1[/tex]

Then the last equation becomes
[tex](2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (\beta+1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + (\alpha-\beta) f(2\rho) = 0[/tex]

First I deal with the case [tex]\beta=0[/tex]

[tex](2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + \alpha f(2\rho) = 0[/tex]

I can show that the solution to this is [tex]f(2\rho) = L_\alpha (2\rho)[/tex]

Next I take the [tex]\beta[/tex]'th derivative of the last equation and get

[tex](2\rho) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} (\frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} L_\alpha (2\rho)) + (\beta + 1-(2\rho)) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} L_\alpha (2\rho) + (\alpha - \beta) \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} L_\alpha (2\rho) = 0[/tex]

Now by writing
[tex]f(2\rho) \equiv \frac{d^\beta}{d (2\rho)^\beta} L_\alpha (2\rho)) \equiv L_\alpha^\beta (2\rho)[/tex]
I arrive at
[tex](2\rho) \frac{d^2}{d (2\rho)^2} f(2\rho) + (\beta+1-(2\rho)) \frac{d}{d (2\rho)} f(2\rho) + (\alpha-\beta) f(2\rho) = 0[/tex]

which clearly has the solution [tex]L_\alpha^\beta (2\rho) = L_{n+1}^{2l+1} (2\rho)[/tex]

If you need me to show more thoroughly some of the steps then I can do this. I just didn't want to bother with too many details.

Of course, there's always the chance that I've made a typo somewhere, because the derivations of special functions are quite cumbersome. So far, I've been unable to find anything.

If anyone could take 2 minutes to analyze this I'd really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I only need to know what kind of Laguerre functions are used with the hydrogen atom. Sometimes they are defined differently.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K