The Attractive Power of the Inverse Square Potential: Do Examples Exist?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of attractive forces described by an inverse square potential, specifically in the form of ##V(\boldsymbol r)\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^2}## as ##|\boldsymbol r|\to 0##. Participants explore various physical examples and theoretical implications of such potentials, including their mathematical representations and the behavior of dipoles and multipoles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the existence of attractive forces with an inverse square potential, suggesting that it implies an inverse cube force law.
  • One participant proposes the electrostatic force on or from a dipole as a potential example, noting that it scales as an inverse cube.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for examples where the potential is of the form ##V\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^n}## with ##n\ge 2##.
  • There is a discussion on multipole expansions, with references to specific potentials for ion-dipole and dipole-dipole interactions, indicating a range of potentials based on multipole orders.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the sign and form of the dipole potential, questioning how it aligns with the required potential form.
  • One participant elaborates on the nature of dipoles, explaining their structure and behavior in an electric field, while seeking clarification on the potential's characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of dipoles as examples of the desired potential form. While some see them as valid, others question their suitability, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific examples that meet the criteria.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical forms and physical principles, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the conditions under which these potentials apply, particularly in relation to the dipole's behavior and the sign of the potential.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrostatics, multipole expansions, and the mathematical modeling of forces in physics, particularly in the context of potential theory.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,283
Reaction score
1,096
Do exist examples of attraction forces with such a type potential
##V(\boldsymbol r)\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^2}, \quad |\boldsymbol r|\to 0##
in physics ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wrobel said:
Do exist examples of attraction forces with such a type potential
##V(\boldsymbol r)\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^2}, \quad |\boldsymbol r|\to 0##
in physics ?
Just spit-balling here... An inverse square potential would imply an inverse cube force law. What do we have for inverse cube forces?

How about the electrostatic force on (or from) a dipole. That should scale as the differential of an inverse square, i.e. as an inverse cube.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and Dale
Thanks. Actually I need physics examples at least such that
##V\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^n},\quad n\ge 2##
 
jbriggs444 said:
How about the electrostatic force on (or from) a dipole. That should scale as the differential of an inverse square, i.e. as an inverse cube.
Excellent response. You could do arbitrary order multipoles to get any n>0 desired
 
wrobel said:
Thanks. Actually I need physics examples at least such that
##V\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^n},\quad n\ge 2##
I am not sure how the suggestion of a dipole fails to satisfy that requirement.

It is a net attractive force and consequently has a negative potential everywhere referenced to zero at infinity. So the sign is right. It approximates an inverse square potential. So the approximation is right (when r >> size of dipole). And n=2 which satisfies n>=2.
 
Look up the "multipole expansion" used in molecular physics (for example, in the textbooks by Demtröder).

You get a ##-1/R^2## potential for ion-dipole interaction, ##-1/R^3## for dipole-dipole, ##-1/R^4## for ion-induced dipole, and so on.
 
Thank you everybody so much!

It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
 
wrobel said:
It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
In simple terms, a "dipole" would be a pair of equal and opposite charges with some fixed separation. For example, a positive charge and an equal negative charge on opposite ends of an insulating stick.

The net charge of this dipole is zero. And we can consider its location to be the midpoint between the two charges.

Now add a fixed positive point charge at the origin of your coordinate system and have this dipole floating in space somewhere. One could use a negative point charge instead. It changes nothing. What is the force of the point charge on the dipole?

Well, the dipole is going to rotate under the influence of the field so that the negative end faces the central charge and the positive end faces away. That means that your ##cos\varphi## term goes away.

Edit: Apologies for the length and the simple mindedness of the response. I was talking my way through it until I finally got to the point of understanding how you'd arrived at your formulation.
 
Last edited:
wrobel said:
Thank you everybody so much!

It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
Are you looking asymptotically for a spherically symmetric potential from a localized source ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
594
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K