The concentration of B at equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium concentration of B in a reaction involving A and B producing C. Given that the concentration of A at equilibrium is 0.246 mol/L, it is established that B is the limiting reactant. The participants emphasize the need to use stoichiometry to relate the concentrations of A, B, and C, suggesting that an ICE table could help clarify the changes in moles during the reaction. The concentration of B can be derived from the moles of A that have reacted, considering the stoichiometric ratios. Ultimately, the concentration of B at equilibrium can be determined through careful calculations based on the initial amounts and the changes at equilibrium.
JessicaHelena
Messages
188
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


For the reaction given below, 2.00 moles of A and 3.00 moles of B are placed in a 6.00L container.
A(g) + 2B(g) --> C(g)
At equilibrium, the concentration of A is 0.246 mol/L. What is the concentration of B at equilibrium?

Homework Equations


for aA+bB-->cC,
K = [C]^c/([A]^a[ B]^b)

c=n/V

The Attempt at a Solution


Frankly, I'm not sure what to do here. The LR is B since using all 3.00 moles of B, we'd only need 1.5 moles of A, but that's when the reaction goes to completion and we don't know if it does. Also, we are not given C's concentration or the K value... What can I do here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
JessicaHelena said:
The LR is B since using all 3.00 moles of B, we'd only need 1.5 moles of A, but that's when the reaction goes to completion and we don't know if it does.
That's something you can figure out

JessicaHelena said:
Also, we are not given C's concentration or the K value...
It is not given because it is not needed.

JessicaHelena said:
What can I do here?
What happens to A and B when you mix them? What is the relation between the concentrations of A, B and C?
 
how can I figure at which point the experiment stops — I'm still not so sure.

The amount of A and B decrease to produce C.

concentrations of A:B:C = # of moles of A:B:C
 
Think in terms of a simple stoichiometry.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
So then at equilibrium, there'd be 0.246 mol/L of A, and 0.246 x 2 mol/L of B and 0.246 mol/L of C?
 
No. you have the concentration of A, and the volume. How many moles of A are there?
So how many moles of A have reacted?
How many moles of B have reacted, and how many are left?
What is the concentration of B?
Have you heard of an ICE table?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top