THE D'Alembert Solution for the 1D Wave Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the D'Alembert solution for the 1D wave equation, specifically addressing the limits of integration in the context of the equation \(u_{tt} = c^2 u_{xx}\). The general solution is expressed as \(u(x,t) = \frac{1}{2} \left[ f(x+ct) + f(x-ct) + \frac{1}{c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(y) dy \right]\). Participants clarify that the limits of integration can be adjusted for convenience, leading to the conclusion that \(\psi(x)\) and \(\theta(x)\) can be expressed in terms of the initial conditions \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\) with appropriate integration limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the 1D wave equation \(u_{tt} = c^2 u_{xx}\)
  • Familiarity with initial conditions in differential equations
  • Knowledge of integration techniques and limits
  • Basic concepts of wave propagation and solutions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the D'Alembert solution in detail
  • Learn about the role of initial conditions in solving partial differential equations
  • Explore integration techniques, particularly in the context of physics
  • Investigate applications of the 1D wave equation in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those focused on wave mechanics and differential equations.

tom_rylex
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am looking at the derivation of the D'alembert equation, and I'm having trouble with understanding where the limits of integration come in.


Homework Equations


Given the 1-d wave equation:
u_{tt} = c^2u_{xx}, with the general solution u(x,t)= \theta(x-ct) + \psi(x+ct) and the initial conditions
u(x,0)=f(x), u_t(x,0)=g(x)

Show that the solution is
u(x,t)=\frac{1}{2} \left[ f(x+ct) + f(x-ct) +\frac{1}{c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(y)dy \right]


The Attempt at a Solution


If I take the second of the initial conditions, I get
-c\theta'(x)+c\phi'(x)=g(x)
-\theta(x)+\phi(x)=\frac{1}{c}\int g(x),

I guess I just don't understand where the limits of integration come from to yield
\frac{1}{c} \int_{-\infty}^x g(y) dy
on the right hand side.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tom_rylex said:

Homework Statement


I am looking at the derivation of the D'alembert equation, and I'm having trouble with understanding where the limits of integration come in.


Homework Equations


Given the 1-d wave equation:
u_{tt} = c^2u_{xx}, with the general solution u(x,t)= \theta(x-ct) + \psi(x+ct) and the initial conditions
u(x,0)=f(x), u_t(x,0)=g(x)

Show that the solution is
u(x,t)=\frac{1}{2} \left[ f(x+ct) + f(x-ct) +\frac{1}{c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(y)dy \right]


The Attempt at a Solution


If I take the second of the initial conditions, I get
-c\theta'(x)+c\phi'(x)=g(x)
-\theta(x)+\phi(x)=\frac{1}{c}\int g(x),
You want "psi", \psi, not "phi", \phi!

I guess I just don't understand where the limits of integration come from to yield
\frac{1}{c} \int_{-\infty}^x g(y) dy
on the right hand side.
Okay, you have, correctly, -\theta(x)+ \psi(x)= (1/c)\int g(x)dx
If you add the first initial condition, \theta(x)+ \psi(x)= f(x), you get 2\psi(x)= f(x)+ (1/c)\int g(x)dx so \psi(x)= (1/2)f(x)+ (1/2c)\int g(x)dx. We can "fix" the undermined constant in that integral by choosing what every limits of integration are convenient, say 0 and x: \psi(x)= (1/2)f(x)+ (1/2c)\int_0^x g(y)dy+ C. Then, since, from your equation again, \theta(x)= \psi(x)- (1/c)\int g(x)dx, \theta(x)= (1/2)f(x)- (1/2c)\int_0^x g(y)dx+ C. Now, replace x with "x-ct" and "x+ ct" in \theta and \psi respectively:
u(x,t)= \theta(x-ct)+ \psi(x+ ct)= (1/2)f(x-ct)- \int_0^{x-ct}g(t)dt- C+ (1/2)f(x+ ct)+ \int_0^{x-ct}g(t)dt+ C

Notice that "-C" and "C" cancel while \int_0^{x-ct}g(y)dy= -\int_{x-ct}^0 g(y)dy so the two integrals combine as \int_0^{x+ ct}g(y) dy+ \int_{x-ct}^0 g(y)dy= \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(y)dy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K