The difference between order parameter and state parameter?

Diracmai
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
At first, we need some state parameters(like P/T/V) to fully describe a system. And the order parameter is also a parameter which could describe the property of the system.
However, in the Laudau theory, why it said that order parameter is an external parameter(not a independent variable)? Is there any different between order parameter and state parameters(like P/T/V etc.)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say no, as in Landau theory we expand the free energy into a power series in the order parameter. Hence it must be a thermodynamic variable.
 
DrDu said:
I would say no, as in Landau theory we expand the free energy into a power series in the order parameter. Hence it must be a thermodynamic variable.
Ok! Actually, I also take the some viewpoint as you. In addition, I have another question.Generally, when we use Laudau phase transition theory, we always choose T and order parameter as free energy's variables. In this condition, it that means we hold other thermodynamic variable as constant and only discuss the relation between order parameter and temperature. In fact, the order parameter can also be the function of other thermodynamic variables.
 
Diracmai said:
In fact, the order parameter can also be the function of other thermodynamic variables.
Isn't this trivial? E.g. you can describe a gas in terms of V and T or in terms of p and T, the transformation being P(T,V). So you can always introduce the order parameter as an independent thermodynamic variable.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top