The dirac equation of the hydrogen atom

Kamper
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What potential would one use when evaluating the Dirac equation of the hydrogen atom? Would it simply be in the form used when examining the hydrogen atom-Schrodinger equation or does it need modification?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In non-rel. QM one starts with the same 1/r potential. What else do you have in mind?
 
tom.stoer said:
In non-rel. QM one starts with the same 1/r potential. What else do you have in mind?

I was just wondering that since the time-independent part of the solution is in vector form you might have to consider a potential in the form of a vector field. But maybe i´m wrong?
 
Thanks for the reply by the way!
 
I was just wondering that since the time-independent part of the solution is in vector form you might have to consider a potential in the form of a vector field. But maybe i´m wrong?
Choose a gauge in which the vector potential A = 0, leaving just the Coulomb 1/r potential. Separate variables in spherical coordinates as usual, and you'll find that the four components of the Dirac spinor can be written in terms of two radial functions, leding to recursion relations, etc, etc, and solved by confluent hypergeometric functions.
 
Bill_K said:
Choose a gauge in which the vector potential A = 0, leaving just the Coulomb 1/r potential. Separate variables in spherical coordinates as usual, and you'll find that the four components of the Dirac spinor can be written in terms of two radial functions, leding to recursion relations, etc, etc, and solved by confluent hypergeometric functions.

Ill try that then. Thank you!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top