The discrete self-trapping equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hootaotao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete
Hootaotao
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anybody help me find a paper?
The name is "The discrete self-trapping equation", or "J.C. Eilbeck, P.S. Lomdahl, A.C. Scott, Physica D 16 (1985) 318."

Thank you very much !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hootaotao said:
Can anybody help me find a paper?
The name is "The discrete self-trapping equation", or "J.C. Eilbeck, P.S. Lomdahl, A.C. Scott, Physica D 16 (1985) 318."

Thank you very much !

try the library.
 


olgranpappy said:
try the library.
The library of my university only provides a paper after 1995, so...

thank you all the same
 


Hootaotao said:
The library of my university only provides a paper after 1995, so...

thank you all the same

My library only has electronic access after 1995 as well.

We have the actual bound paper volumes from 1980 onward, but I'm too lazy to make a physical (non-virtual) trip to the library. Cheers.
 


olgranpappy said:
My library only has electronic access after 1995 as well.
I see. So You can read only tales about subject...
-------------------------------------------
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it. Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) It's a pity, You can't read even Bohr, without particle "re".
 
Last edited:


thanks everybody, i have one
if anyone has problems may email me and have a talk,
i am majoring theoretical physics using MD
you are wellcome!
<personal email deleted>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top