Self Trapped & Charge Transfer Excitons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter citw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Self
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of "self-trapped" and "charge-transfer" excitons, particularly in the context of inorganic semiconductors. Participants explore the definitions, mechanisms, and implications of these excitons, as well as their relationship to lattice deformations and electronic excitations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about "self-trapped" excitons and their relation to lattice deformation, indicating a lack of understanding of self-trapped electrons or holes.
  • Another participant provides a reference to a specific example of a self-trapped charge-transfer exciton in NiO, suggesting a practical context for the discussion.
  • A participant explains the nature of charge-transfer excitons, detailing p-d and d-d transitions involving electron transfers between oxygen and nickel orbitals, while also mentioning Jahn-Teller distortion as a factor in self-trapping.
  • There is a question about the meaning of "self-trapping," with a participant noting the difficulty in extending the concept from single charge carriers to excitons.
  • A later reply suggests that self-trapping may involve an increase in effective mass due to coupling with lattice deformations, drawing a parallel to polarons.
  • Another participant agrees with the effective mass point and connects the discussion to polarons, while acknowledging their own limited expertise on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the concepts of self-trapping and charge-transfer excitons. There is no consensus on the definitions or implications of these terms, and multiple interpretations and models are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of familiarity with the foundational concepts, which may limit the depth of the discussion. The relationship between excitons and lattice deformations remains partially unresolved, with assumptions about effective mass and mobility being explored but not definitively established.

citw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the concept of "self-trapped" and "charge-transfer" excitons, and I'm hoping someone can break these concepts down for me. I've studied Wannier and Frenkel excitons a bit.

I'm reasonably unfamiliar with the concept of "self-trapping". I only know that it involves some deformation of the lattice, which isn't a very complete or understandable description. I don't really understand the idea of self-trapped electrons or holes, much less excitons.

I also need to understand "charge-transfer" excitons in the context of inorganic semiconductors. I'm guessing this is more applicable with semiconductors with at least some degree of ionic character. This is particularly confusing to me, as I understood excitons to transfer energy with no net charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you encounter these terms?
 
First, an exciton is almost any kind of electronic excitation, this can also go in hand with some charge separation. As nicely explained in the article, there are p-d and d-d type charge transfer excitons, where in the first case an electron is transferred from an oxygen p-orbital to a Ni-d-orbital correspondint to O2- + Ni2+ -> O- + Ni+, and in the second case a d-electron is transferred from one Ni atom to an adjacent one corresponding to Ni2+ + Ni2+ -> Ni+ + Ni3+.
The self-trapping seems to be due mainly to Jahn Teller distortion in the Ni+ ion, i.e. a prolongation of the octahedra formed by the oxygen ions along one of the four-fold axes, as is well known from Cu2+ complexes (which are square-planar as you certainly remember from your chemistry classes).
 
DrDu said:
First, an exciton is almost any kind of electronic excitation, this can also go in hand with some charge separation. As nicely explained in the article, there are p-d and d-d type charge transfer excitons, where in the first case an electron is transferred from an oxygen p-orbital to a Ni-d-orbital correspondint to O2- + Ni2+ -> O- + Ni+, and in the second case a d-electron is transferred from one Ni atom to an adjacent one corresponding to Ni2+ + Ni2+ -> Ni+ + Ni3+.
The self-trapping seems to be due mainly to Jahn Teller distortion in the Ni+ ion, i.e. a prolongation of the octahedra formed by the oxygen ions along one of the four-fold axes, as is well known from Cu2+ complexes (which are square-planar as you certainly remember from your chemistry classes).

OK, aside from the charge-transfer explanation, what exactly is meant by self-trapping. I've read about charge carriers (electrons and holes) becoming "self-trapped", but "self" throws me off a bit. The extension to excitons is clearly lost on me, as I don't particularly grasp the concept on a single carrier basis, much less for coupled carriers.
 
citw said:
OK, aside from the charge-transfer explanation, what exactly is meant by self-trapping. I've read about charge carriers (electrons and holes) becoming "self-trapped", but "self" throws me off a bit. The extension to excitons is clearly lost on me, as I don't particularly grasp the concept on a single carrier basis, much less for coupled carriers.

I think it refers to a strong increase of effective mass (equivalently a flattening of the exciton band) due to the coupling of the electronic excitation to deformations of the lattice (here Jahn-Teller distortions).
 
DrDu said:
I think it refers to a strong increase of effective mass (equivalently a flattening of the exciton band) due to the coupling of the electronic excitation to deformations of the lattice (here Jahn-Teller distortions).

Oh that's a really interesting idea. The effective mass point sounds very reasonable, considering a "trapped" carrier would obviously have very low mobility. Although, coupling the lattice distortion with the exitation makes me think of something similar to a polaron.
 
citw said:
Oh that's a really interesting idea. The effective mass point sounds very reasonable, considering a "trapped" carrier would obviously have very low mobility. Although, coupling the lattice distortion with the exitation makes me think of something similar to a polaron.

Yes, I also learned about this mechanism in the context of polarons. I am also not an expert on this topic, so take my statement at best as an educated guess.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
508
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K