The distribution of charges in a conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electric charge density and surface curvature in conductors. It explains that charge density is higher near surfaces with greater curvature due to the tangential component of the Coulomb force being less in these areas, requiring more charge to maintain the same force. Charges within a conductor will redistribute until any internal electric fields are canceled out, resulting in an electric field that is normal to the surface. The divergence of the electric field, which correlates with charge density, is greater on curved surfaces, leading to higher charge concentration. Ultimately, all charge resides on the surface of the conductor, as the electric field inside remains zero.
micomaco86572
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I was taught in my Eletricmagnetics Lessons that the density of electric charge is higher near the surface with big curvature and lower near the flat surface.
Why does the density of electric charge has something to do with the surface curvature?
Is this because such a system has the minimal energy?


thx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider that the charges are constrained to move on the surface. Then you can see that their motion is determined by the tangential component of the Coulomb force. In a region with high curvature the tangential component is less so it requires more charge to make the same force.

That is a rather "hand-waving" argument, but I find it rather intuitive.
 
The charges in a conductor repell and go apart as far as possible. If a ball has a niddle on its surface, some charges will go to the niddle. But if a ball has a niddle hole inwards, they will not accumulate there.
 
I think the question has been pretty well answered but since I love to hear myself talk I'm going to add a bit.

Since charges can move in a conductor any electric field inside the conductor will not last as it means a force on the charges which then move in reaction to the force. Eventually the charges must move until they cancel out any internal E-fields.

Now we come to the surface where the charges cannot move outward. There thus can be an E-field at the surface but it must be normal to this surface since any lateral component again means a component of force on charges which can move in this lateral direction. So picture a blob shaped conductor as having 0 E field inside and at the surface the E-field points straight out.

Finally recall that the divergence of the E field (the degree to which it radiates outward rather than lining up parallel) is proportional to the charge density. Given the E field is normal to the surface the more curved the surface the higher the divergence of the E field and thus the more concentrated the charge density. This isn't so much a causal explanation but a way to see that this is how it must be.

By the same equation we see that since the divergence of the zero E field inside the conductor is also zero we know that none of the charge is distributed through the interior of the conductor and all must reside at the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top