The Divergence of the Klein-Gordon Energy-Momentum Tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the derivation of the Klein-Gordon energy-momentum tensor, specifically addressing the proof of the divergence of the tensor, represented as $$\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}$$. The user details their attempts to simplify the equation, highlighting errors in existing solutions and emphasizing the importance of maintaining the 1/2 coefficient in the derivation. The discussion culminates in a critical examination of the terms involved, ultimately leading to a clearer understanding of the tensor's behavior under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and calculus
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Knowledge of the product rule in differentiation
  • Basic principles of field theory and energy-momentum tensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in detail
  • Learn about the properties of energy-momentum tensors in field theory
  • Explore advanced tensor calculus techniques
  • Review solutions to common problems in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on the Klein-Gordon equation and energy-momentum tensors.

GooberGunter
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Prove that the Energy-Momentum Tensor for the Klein-Gordon Equation does not diverge
$$\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}=0$$
Relevant Equations
$$T^{μν}=∂^μϕ∂^νϕ−η^{μν}L$$
$$L=\frac{1}{2}\partial^2 \phi - \frac{1}{2}m^2 \phi^2$$
I've tried this problem so, so, so so so many times. Given the equations above, the proof starts easily enough:
$$\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu (∂^μ ϕ∂^ν ϕ)-\eta^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu[\frac{1}{2}∂^2ϕ−\frac{1}{2}m^2ϕ^2]$$
apply product rule to all terms
$$=\partial^\nu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi + \partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}[\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)-\frac{1}{2}m^2\partial_\mu(\phi^2)]$$
And the equation of motion starts to appear:
$$=\partial^\nu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi + \eta^{\mu\nu}(m^2 \phi \partial_\mu \phi) +\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$
Finally we can eliminate 2 of the 5 terms
$$=\partial^\nu \phi \cdot (\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi + m^2 \phi) +\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi+ \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$
$$=\partial^\nu \phi[0] +\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$

This is the last step I arrive at
$$=\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$
Every solution I've found online has an error or skips this crucial step.

This solutions manual from a UMD course skips a step between (31) and (32) and too readily removes the 1/2 coefficient in (31). I'm sure its a typo.
This solution from another post just raises the index of the first derivative and lowers the sigma index in the second derivative, but the closest I can replicate is:

$$=\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2}(\eta^{\mu\nu} \delta^{\sigma}_\nu\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \eta^{\mu\nu} \delta^{\sigma}_\nu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$
$$=\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2}(\partial^\nu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu\phi + \partial^\nu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi)$$

Depending on what you decide to contract, you end up with 2 equations that don't resolve to 0.
$$\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi -\partial^\nu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu\phi$$
$$\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi$$

My understanding of tensor notation is still a little shaky, I only studied a chapter from a mathematical methods textbook. Where did I go wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
GooberGunter said:
This is the last step I arrive at
$$=\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$​
I think this is good so far.

Show that the first term may be written $$\partial^\mu \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\nu \phi =\partial_\mu \phi \cdot \partial^\mu \partial^\nu \phi =\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial^\sigma \partial^\nu \phi$$

Show that the second term may be written $$ \eta^{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial_\mu \partial_\sigma \phi) = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma \phi \cdot \partial^\nu \partial^\sigma \phi + \partial^\sigma \phi \cdot \partial^\nu \partial_\sigma \phi)$$ Then proceed onward.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K