The Double Slit Experiment: A Fascinating Introduction to Quantum Physics

Gadget_Wizard
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4237751840526284618

Something interesting i found, pretty much introduces Quantum Physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OH GOD! No, why, WHY! Not this again!

If your wondering why I'm acting like this, this clip is from the movie..."What the bleep do we know?" What this movie does to Quantum Mechanics is..........disgusting to say the least.I don't like supporting this movie, even in parts on youtube. Please find another source for information about quantum mechanics please!(BTW, I'm not mad at you gadget. I just can't stand this movie!)
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
OH GOD! No, why, WHY! Not this again!

If your wondering why I'm acting like this, this clip is from the movie..."What the bleep do we know?" What this movie does to Quantum Mechanics is..........disgusting to say the least.


I don't like supporting this movie, even in parts on youtube. Please find another source for information about quantum mechanics please!


(BTW, I'm not mad at you gadget. I just can't stand this movie!)
Ironically, its that same movie that made me become so interested in physics. I saw that movie about 1 year ago and ever sinse then I have been studieng that sort of thing nonstop. Ironically I see now that the movie, well, might have over exaderated QM a little bit. No that its any less interesting now. But cmon, "the electron changes the way it acts... almost like it KNOWS its being watched", I don't care how layman you are, you don't need to sugar coat "the act of measurment collapses the wavefunction" THAT much.
 
G01 said:
What this movie does to Quantum Mechanics is ... disgusting to say the least.

If by "disgusting" you mean "makes it accessible" then yes, its disgusting.

But, yes, the anthropomorphism of electrons is a bit hard to listen to.
 
Bob-O-Rama said:
If by "disgusting" you mean "makes it accessible" then yes, its disgusting.

But, yes, the anthropomorphism of electrons is a bit hard to listen to.
It doesn't make it accessible, it just twists it and exaterates it until it makes it sound like you can win the lotery by just thinking about it when you wake up. That makes perfect sense, if you can collapse a wavefunction by measuring it, that also means you can completely manipule and affect the reality around you to do anything you want!
Anybody can access QM, there are plenty of layman books out there (I would know, considering I have never read a mathematical book about QM, that's waaaay beyond my level of education at this point in my life) that anyone can read and understand. All this movie did was manipulate QM to get as many ratings as possible, and in doing so completely changed what QM is all about.
 
Last edited:
SpazAttack said:
Ironically, its that same movie that made me become so interested in physics.

Exactly the point I was making. :smile:
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top