The Double Slit Interference: How does it relate to the definition of coherence?

AI Thread Summary
Coherence in the context of the double slit experiment refers to the constant phase difference between waves arriving at specific points on the screen, not across the entire setup. Each point on the screen can experience a different phase difference due to varying path lengths from the two sources. Bright and dark fringes result from these specific phase differences at each point, which determine constructive or destructive interference. The total phase difference at any point is influenced by both the original phase difference between sources and the additional phase difference due to path length differences. Understanding this concept clarifies how coherence relates to the observed interference patterns.
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
I know this is a very trivial concept, so can someone please point out to me where I'm going wrong with this? We use coherent waves to observe an interference pattern, and coherence by definition is the presence of a constant phase difference between two waves. Yet, we see bright and dark fringes, and at each fringe the phase difference between the two waves is different. Doesn't this contradict the definition of coherence? Where am I getting this wrong?
By the way, I'm still in high school, so I would not be able to understand any discussions regarding wave functions and quantum mechanics.
 
Science news on Phys.org
When we say "constant phase difference between two waves" we mean "between the waves along the two paths from the two sources to a particular point on the screen."

Call the two sources A and B, and call points on the screen 1, 2, etc.

The two waves that arrive at point 1 from A and B must have a constant phase difference. The amount of phase difference determines whether point 1 is on a bright fringe, a dark fringe, or in between.

The two waves that arrive at point 2 from A and B must also have a constant phase difference, but this difference may be a different amount from the difference at point 1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jtbell said:
When we say "constant phase difference between two waves" we mean "between the waves along the two paths from the two sources to a particular point on the screen."

Call the two sources A and B, and call points on the screen 1, 2, etc.

The two waves that arrive at point 1 from A and B must have a constant phase difference. The amount of phase difference determines whether point 1 is on a bright fringe, a dark fringe, or in between.

The two waves that arrive at point 2 from A and B must also have a constant phase difference, but this difference may be a different amount from the difference at point 1.

Thanks! Makes sense now!
So, let's say the two waves have a phase difference of 0. Would it be appropriate to say that this phase difference changes once the two waves reach a point on the screen? (As a result of the path difference.)
 
Yes. The phase difference at a particular point on the screen comes about in two ways: (a) the original phase difference between the sources, and (b) the additional phase difference caused by the path difference.

If the phase difference (in radians) is δ and the path difference (in meters) is Δ, then
$$\delta = \delta_0 + 2 \pi \frac{\Delta}{\lambda}$$
(one cycle of phase difference = ##2\pi## radians.)
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top