The Earthly Risk of Rogue Black Holes

  • Thread starter Thread starter hammertime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Rogue black holes pose a negligible risk to Earth, with estimates suggesting that around 100 to potentially thousands of such black holes exist in the Milky Way halo. These black holes, ejected from globular clusters, typically have masses ranging from 100 to 1000 solar masses and move at velocities of a few hundred kilometers per second. Current assessments indicate that the likelihood of a rogue black hole impacting Earth is vanishingly small and can be considered insignificant. A technical article discussing these findings has been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal, indicating its scientific credibility. Overall, the consensus is that the threat from rogue black holes is minimal and can largely be ignored.
hammertime
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
What kind of a risk do rogue black holes pose to Earth?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
almost none, I should think
http://chandra.harvard.edu/resources/faq/black_hole/bhole-86.html

You might be interested in this technical article

http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1334

Here's a sample exerpt from the conclusions section near the end:

"With so many small black holes having been ejected
from their host globular clusters, we speculate that ∼
100 rogue black holes are swarming about in the Milky
Way halo with masses from ∼ 100 − 1000M⊙, and with
velocities mostly on the order of a few hundred km s^−1.
The number of rogues could be in the thousands if, as has
been suggested, the current globular cluster population
is a small fraction of the total number originally created
(Aguilar et al. 1988)."

The article has been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal---it is not just a popular science-journalism piece.
Still too early to know if it will pass peer-review and be accepted for publication. I know two of the authors somewhat by name and reputation and my hunch is that it is journal-quality and will appear in ApJ.

the impression I get is that the risk from "rogue" BHs (which I think just means BHs given random eccentric motion by the kick of their formation) is negligible----the risk is vanishingly small and can be ignored.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top