The Electric Field: Understanding its Negative Gradient

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Can someone remind me why the electric field is defined as the negative gradient times the electric potential, rather than the gradient times the electric potential?

Thanks,


JL
 
on Phys.org
If you move up an electric field, the potential increases.

Suppose that for points A and B, the potential at B is higher. Then moving from A to B, the distance is, say, positive, and so the potential difference is also positive. But then the eletric field is directed from B to A, and so is negative, which is accounted for by using the negative gradient.

I hope that helps.
 
[tex]V = \frac{kQ}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr}= \frac{-kQ}{r^2} \times \frac{q}{q}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr} = \frac{ \frac{-kQq}{r^2}}{q} = - \frac{F}{q}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr}= -E \Rightarrow E= - \frac{dV}{dr}[/tex]
 
jix said:
If you move up an electric field, the potential increases.

Suppose that for points A and B, the potential at B is higher. Then moving from A to B, the distance is, say, positive, and so the potential difference is also positive. But then the eletric field is directed from B to A, and so is negative, which is accounted for by using the negative gradient.

I hope that helps.

That helps a lot, I was looking for a conceptual explanation.

rock.freak667 said:
[tex]V = \frac{kQ}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr}= \frac{-kQ}{r^2} \times \frac{q}{q}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr} = \frac{ \frac{-kQq}{r^2}}{q} = - \frac{F}{q}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dV}{dr}= -E \Rightarrow E= - \frac{dV}{dr}[/tex]

I will try to understand this later, I'm not sure about that cross or is it cross product.


Thanks guys,


Jeffrey
 
jeff1evesque said:
I will try to understand this later, I'm not sure about that cross or is it cross product.

No cross-product, just multiplication.
 
Here's another way they derived the formula:

Work-Energy Theorem relates the potential difference to work as:

[tex]\Delta U=U_{f}-U_{i}=-W[/tex]

If the "electrical potential energy", [tex]U[/tex], at infinity is defined to be 0, then the electrical potential energy of a single point charge is defined as:

[tex]U=-W[/tex]

To define the electric potential of a charge, we divide it's energy by it's charge.

[tex]V=\frac{-U}{q}[/tex]

The electrical potential difference from infinity to a point is therefore:

[tex]\Delta V=V_{f}-V_{i}=-\frac{W}{q}[/tex]

Subbing the definition of W from mechanics:

[tex]V=- \frac{ \int \textbf{F} \cdot d\textbf{r}}{q}[/tex]

[tex]V=-\frac{1}{q}\int\textbf{F} \cdot d\textbf{r}[/tex]

[tex]V=-\frac{1}{q}\int\frac{kqq}{r^{2}}\cdot d\textbf{r}[/tex]

[tex]V=-\int\frac{kq}{r^{2}}\cdot d\textbf{r}[/tex]

[tex]V=-\int E \cdot d\textbf{r}[/tex]

Taking the gradient of both sides, you get:

[tex]\nabla V=-\nabla\int \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{r}[/tex]

[tex]\nabla V=-\textbf{E}[/tex]

[tex]\textbf{E}=-\nabla V[/tex]
 
Last edited: